Page 109 - Museums, Media and Cultural Theory In Cultural and Media Studies
P. 109

MEDIA ||  93

                  recognition of how diversity channelled through certain experience-led exhibi-
                  tionary strategies may end up producing homogeneity. Museums may subscribe
                  to the politics of multiculturalism, or emphasize pluralism and tolerance, yet at
                  the same time aim to control and produce much the same experience for all
                  visitors. The current strategies for manufacturing subjective experience that we
                  may  find in museums in the United States, and increasingly worldwide, are
                  premised on an assumption of universal human sameness and monolithic truth.
                  Hein (2000: 80) says:

                    Underlying the promise of existential communion, and despite the appeal
                    to ‘diverse’ audiences, the epistemological conviction remains strong – in
                    museums as elsewhere – that ultimately there is one truth and that a single
                    (and well-controlled) stimulus will recall it . . . Even as we stand, side by
                    side, simultaneously undergoing our separate experiences, ‘shaped’ by a
                    museum environment, we are prompted to carry away the judgement of a
                    ‘same’ and publicly acknowledged reality.
                    Earlier in this chapter I discussed Theodor Adorno’s writing on standardiza-
                  tion. The differences between products appeal to our sense of distinction, of
                  our difference from others, and give an appearance of choice and diversity.
                  However Adorno argued that in a capitalist society dominated by mass produc-
                  tion, these differences are actually superficial and conceal an underlying same-
                  ness. There is a parallel here: our own complex social attachments, the social
                  basis for our different knowledges and understandings, and the real diversity of
                  experience that we bring as visitors to the museum are subordinated to a con-
                  trolled museum experience designed to reveal a larger, shared, and preferably
                  unquestionable truth. This standardization of experience is also associated
                  with commodification. The public museum has always been an institution
                  devoted to the representation of universal truths, but it has not always dealt in
                  experience in this way. This new orientation towards the production of experi-
                  ence has developed since the 1980s, during a period when free-market or neo-
                  liberal policies have steadily privatized and increased market control over culture,
                  media and education. In this new social context, experience becomes a com-
                  modity, purchasable for the price of a ticket. Across a range of attractions,
                  visitors are treated as consumers of experience; their sense of themselves as
                  individuals is appealed to, while real and significant social differences are
                  repressed or disavowed. Though she doesn’t make much of it, Hein recognizes
                  that the new experience emphasis is linked to commodification and to the
                  emergence of a new experience economy (2000: note 12, 198).
                    We can distinguish between various kinds of exhibition strategies: between
                  object-led and experience–led exhibits, or, as I did in Chapter 2, between hands-
                  on exhibits and illusionistic and simulation-based approaches to display. But
   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114