Page 54 - Museums, Media and Cultural Theory In Cultural and Media Studies
P. 54

38   || MUSEUMS, MEDIA AND CULTURAL THEORY

                   was characteristic of the early twentieth-century avant-garde. The Italian
                   Futurist Filippo Tomaso Marinetti denounced museums as cemeteries in his
                   1909  ‘Founding and Manifesto of Futurism’ (Marinetti 1973). The Soviet
                   painter Kasimir Malevich compared the art of the past to corpses, while the
                   Soviet critic N. Tarabukin described the art museum as a cemetery and art
                   historians as grave robbers (Groys 1994: 148–50). In the late nineteenth century,
                   the metaphor was used by critics of various political and aesthetic inclinations.
                   In France the Romantic poet Alphonse Lamartine called the museum a ‘cemet-
                   ery of the arts’, the nationalist politician and writer Maurice Barres referred
                   to it as the place where ‘the dead corrupt the living’, and the writer Paul Valéry
                   described it as a place where ‘dead visions’ compete for attention (Bazin 1967:
                   265; Valéry 1956). These attacks on the museum were informed by different
                   politics, but they shared a vehement rejection of the Victorian obsession with
                   the past, and especially, the art of the past.
                     The cemetery metaphor was also used by members of the museum world
                   who were pressing for change. In 1888, George Brown Goode, the assistant
                   secretary of the Smithsonian in Washington, argued that ‘the museum of the
                   past must be set aside, reconstructed, transformed from a cemetery of bric-a-
                   brac into a nursery of living thoughts’ (cited in Conn 1998: 20). By contrasting
                   the cemetery with the nursery, Goode evoked the two poles of life and implied
                   a distinction between the overcrowding of ‘bric-a-brac’ and the neatly planted
                   seedlings of the nursery. He meant that museums need to change, become
                   more systematic and organized to ensure that their objects become objects of
                   knowledge.
                     The cemetery metaphor was quite differently employed by Marinetti. In the
                   ‘Founding and Manifesto of Futurism’, he denounced museums as cemeteries,
                   suggesting they only be visited as we might visit a grave, to annually place a
                   wreath beneath the Mona Lisa. He announced:
                     It is from Italy that we launch through the world this violently upsetting
                     incendiary manifesto of ours. With it, today, we establish Futurism because
                     we want to free this land from its smelly gangrene of professors, archae-
                     ologists, ciceroni and antiquarians. For too long has Italy been a dealer in
                     second-hand clothes. We mean to free her from the numberless museums
                     that cover her like so many graveyards.
                                                                    (Marinetti 1973)

                   Marinetti attacked the museum’s orientation toward the past and toward
                   ‘dead’ things, and scorned the encyclopaedic pretensions of the late Victorian
                   museum. Like Goode, he described cemeteries as overcrowded spaces, but the
                   effect of this overcrowding is not disorder (to which he was rather partial)
                   but an intimacy between strangers, between bodies whose lives had been lived
   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59