Page 130 - Nanotechnology an introduction
P. 130

Chapter Contents

    12.1 Technical Revolutions 229
    12.2 Scientific Impacts 232
    12.3 Technical Impacts 232
      12.3.1 Information Technologies 232
      12.3.2 Energy 233
      12.3.3 Health 235
    12.4 Commercial and Economic Impacts 239
    12.5 Environmental Impacts 241
    12.6 Social Implications 242
      12.6.1 Regulation 242
      12.6.2 Military Implications 242
      12.6.3 Technical Literacy 243
      12.6.4 Education 243
    12.7 Impacts on Individual Psychology 244
    12.8 Some Ethical Issues 244
    12.9 Summary 245
    12.10 Further Reading 246
  The most important technical impacts of nanotechnology currently seem to be on information processing, energy and health. Ultimately impacts will, however, be on a broader plane, because nanotechnology epitomizes a deeper, more
  rational view of the universe, including all practical aspects of our environment. Nevertheless, it is far from certain that humanity will take up the challenge of the new opportunities, especially the possibility for everyone to participate in
  shaping his or her own environment, as much a producer as a consumer. For this reason, those that hold this vision, and see such a development as the only one offering a way forward for humanity, have a special responsibility to promote
  the vision and its realization.
  Keywords: information technology, energy, health, revolutions, commercial impact, economic impact, environmental impact, technical literacy, social impact, ethics
  One might well wonder, after having been confronted by all this marvellous technology and potential technology, whether it has the potential for
  positively  benefiting  civilization  in  contributing  to  the  elevation  of  society.  This  final  chapter  examines  the  actual  and  potential  impacts  of
  nanotechnology. These introductory paragraphs provide an overview; scientific and technical revolutions are considered, in order to decide whether
  nanotechnology  merits  being  considered  as  one;  more  detailed  coverage  of  individual  areas  is  then  given:  scientific,  technical,  economic,
  environmental, social and finally ethical aspects. There is of course overlap between these areas and the division between them is to be somewhat
  arbitrary. Technical impacts, in other words applications, are covered in the greatest detail, focusing attention on the “big three” areas—computing,
  energy and health. Here too there is overlap between them.
  It  is  necessary  to  consider  both  what  might  be  called  “soft”  and  “hard”  aspects  of  nanotechnology,  in  the  sense  of  unexceptionable  and
  controversial, respectively. The former corresponds to the near-term—in some cases what is already realized; the latter corresponds to the long-
  term; that is, productive nanosystems, as embodied by the personal nanofactory. As with any long-term extrapolation of technology, there is a
  considerable element of speculation concerning the latter, especially regarding timescales.

  Applications can be considered as both direct and indirect. An example of the former is a nanoparticle that functions as a medicinal drug and can
  be injected as such directly into the bloodstream of a patient. An example of the latter is an information processor (computer) based on very large-
  scale integrated chips with individual circuit components in the nanoscale (but the overall size of the device and that of many essential peripheral
  components is bigger than the nanoscale); the direct application of the nanotechnology is to the realization of the integrated circuit; the many
  applications of the circuitry count as indirect applications of nanotechnology.

  Can nanotechnology help to solve the great and pressing problems of contemporary humanity? Although, if ranked, there might be some debate
  about the order, most people would include rapid climate change, environmental degradation, energy and other resource depletion, unfavorable
  demographic  trends,  insufficiency  of  food,  and  nuclear  proliferation  among  the  biggest  challenges.  Can  these  problems  be  solved  if
  nanotechnology  is  the  continuation  of  technological  progress,  which  might  ultimately  be  revolutionary  if  the  quantitative  change  becomes  big
  enough to rank as qualitative? For example, atom-by-atom assembly of artifacts implies, conversely, that discarded ones can be disassembled
  according to a similar principle, hence the problem of waste (and concomitant environmental pollution) vanishes. More advanced understanding at
  the nanoscale should finally allow us to create artificial energy-harvesting systems, mimicking photosynthesis, hence the potential penury of energy
  disappears. If the manufacture of almost everything becomes localized, the transport of goods (a major contributor to energy consumption and
  environmental degradation) should dwindle to practically nothing. Localized energy production would have a similar effect, eliminating the need for
  a vast distribution infrastructure. However, the achievement of this ultimate state of affairs depends on the advent of the personal nanofactory, or
  something resembling it, which is by no means inevitable. Perhaps the miniature medical robot (often called the nanobot) is somewhat closer to
  realization—in essence it is simply a more advanced version of the responsive drug delivery nanoparticles that are already being deployed. Would
  indefatigably  circulating  nanobots  inside  our  bodies  enable  our  lives  to  be  extended  almost  indefinitely?  And  if  so,  what  would  be  the
  consequences?

  Reports published during the last few years are typically euphoric about nanotechnology and all the benefits it will bring. Many of the examples are,
  however, of a relatively trivial nature and do not seem to represent sufficient breakthrough novelty to constitute a revolution. Thus, we already have
  nanostructured textiles that resist staining, self-cleaning glass incorporating nanoparticulate photocatalysts capable of decomposing dirt (Figure
  7.24); nanoparticle-based sun creams that effectively filter out ultraviolet light without scattering it and are therefore transparent; even lighter and
  stronger tennis rackets made with carbon fiber or even carbon nanotube composites; and so forth. None of these developments can be said to be
  truly revolutionary in terms of impact on civilization. Indeed, they are rather low-profile; one might not even notice them if they were not pointed out. In
   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135