Page 18 - Nanotechnology an introduction
P. 18

Element                         Symbol                     Atomic number                         Radius/nm [98]
  Carbon                           C                                               6 0.077
  Chlorine                         Cl                                              17 0.099
  Gold                             Au                                              79 0.150
  Hydrogen                         H                                               1 0.031
  Silicon                          Si                                              14 0.117
  Sodium                           Na                                              11 0.154
  Zinc                             Zn                                              30 0.131
  2.1. The Size of Atoms
  An atom is important because it designates the ultimate (from a terrestrial viewpoint) particles in which matter exists. It was therefore very natural
  for Richard Feynman to suggest atom-by-atom construction of objects as the lower limit of miniaturization of engineering [56]. It would be highly
  impracticable to have to start with subatomic particles, such as protons, electrons, neutrons and so forth as building blocks, whereas atomically
  precise construction, as Feynman rightly perceived and emphasized, is an engineering problem (hence solvable in principle), not a scientific one
  (requiring the discovery of hitherto unknown laws). Table 2.1 gives the sizes of some atoms.
  The scale of the individual atom might be considered as sufficient for a definition of the nanoscale, especially if nanotechnology were to be defined
  solely in the context of atom-by-atom assembly of objects. But nanotechnology already seems to be much more than this. The definitions of
  nanotechnology (Chapter 1) emphasize that novel, unique properties emerge at the nanoscale. This implies that merely assembling an otherwise
  known macro-object atom-by-atom warrants the name of nanotechnology by virtue of the novelty of the assembly process.

  2.2. Molecules and Surfaces
  The dictionary definition of a molecule is typically “the smallest part of a substance that retains all the properties of the substance without losing its
  chemical identity and is composed of one or more atoms”. This combines its etymological meaning as the diminutive of the Latin moles, mass
  (which on its own would make the word essentially synonymous with “particle”) with Tyndall's definition as “a group of atoms drawn and held
  together by what chemists term affinity”. This definition is readily applicable to typical covalent molecules such as most organic compounds; a
  molecule of the carbohydrate called glucose is precisely the particle composed of 6 carbon atoms, 6 oxygen atoms and 12 hydrogen atoms
  connected in such a way as to make what we know as glucose, and even a single such particle would taste sweet in the characteristic way of
  glucose, but none of these atoms could be removed without destroying the “glucoseness”. Particles of other kinds of substances do not fit the
  definition so well. A single atom of a metal such as gold, although chemically gold, has a different optical absorption spectrum from that of bulk
  gold, and the same applies to numerous binary semiconducting compounds such as cadmium sulfide, CdS, which can be prepared as a vapor
  containing isolated CdS molecules (in the chemical sense). In bulk material, the individual atoms are close enough for the wave functions of their
  electrons to overlap, but to satisfy Pauli's exclusion principle, their energies must be slightly shifted, forming a band of states instead of a discrete
  level as in the isolated atom or molecule; see also Section 2.5.
  The surface of a particle is qualitatively different from the bulk because it is less connected; the smaller the radius, the greater the proportion of
  underconnected atoms. Consider a “supersphere”, a spherical aggregate of spheres, which we can take to be atoms (Figure 2.1). By simple
  geometric considerations, only one of the 19 atoms is not in contact with the surface. If the radii of the atom and the supersphere are r  and R
                                                                   3
  respectively, then the proportion of atoms in the shell must be 1 − [(R − r)/R] . The mean connectivity, and hence cohesive energy, should vary
  inversely with a fractional power of this quantity. If R is expressed in units of r, then the surface to volume ratio is equal to 3r/R: in other words, if R =
  3r, equal numbers of atoms are in the bulk and at the surface. The nanoparticle is, therefore, one that is “all surface”. As a result, the melting point
  T  of small spheres is lowered relative to that of bulk material, according to
   m
                                                                                                                       (2.1)
  where C is a constant, and with the exponent n = 1 for metals as shown by experimental studies. In fact, melting is a rather complex phenomenon
  and if an approach such as that of Lindemann's criterion is adopted, due account of the difference between the surface and the bulk atoms might
  be important in determining the temperature of some practical process, such as sintering. Furthermore, it should be noted that if a nanoscale thin
  film is investigated, rather than particles (i.e., a nanoplate), there is no depression of the melting point relative to the bulk [89].
























  Figure 2.1 Cross-section of a spherical nanoparticle consisting of 19 atoms.
  As Wulff has pointed out, for a crystal growing in equilibrium with its vapor or solution, the ratio of the surface tension γ of the growing phase to the
  distance from the center r should be constant. If the mechanical effect of the surface tension can be reduced to an isotropic pressure, then we have
  the Laplace law
   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23