Page 155 - New Trends In Coal Conversion
P. 155

118                                            New Trends in Coal Conversion

         well below the levels required within IEA long-term climate models. Acceleration is
         urgently needed to ramp up the contribution of bioenergy across all sectors. Moreover,
         bioenergy is a complex subject with many potential feedstocks, conversion processes,
         and energy applications. It interacts strongly with the agriculture, forestry, and waste
         management sectors, and its prospects are linked to the growth of a broader bio-
         economy (IEA, 2017).
            The use of renewable energy is nowadays an unavoidable measure to attain sustain-
         able development in the world. However, combustion of fossil fuels is still the main
         source of energy on the earth and a major contributor to atmospheric carbon dioxide
         emissions, which are directly related with the global warming and climate change con-
         cerns. Coal is a cheaper and more abundant resource than other fossil fuels, such as oil
         and natural gas, while at the same time it is a reliable fuel for power production (Tof-
         tegaard et al., 2010). Over 40% of the worldwide electricity is produced from coal
         (IEA, 2016), and it is expected that coal plays an important role on the energy supply
         if the global energy demand continues to rise in the near future.
            Biomass is considered as a renewable energy source for mitigating greenhouse
         gases (GHGs), nitrogen oxides, and sulfur oxide emissions. Biomass is carbon neutral,
         and it has low contents of nitrogen and sulfur. Combustion of biomass is the most inex-
         pensive option of converting biomass fuels to energy. The carbon dioxide generated
         from the combustion of biomass has been previously removed from the atmosphere
         by the photosynthesis process while the plant grows, hence net carbon emissions
         are null. Biomass can be derived from different organic matter resources such as dedi-
         cated energy crops, forestry and agriculture residues, seaweed, animal manure, and
         organic wastes. Thus, biomass can be classified based on its origin into the following:
         (1) primary residues such as wood, straw, cereals, maize, etc., obtained from the by-
         products of forest products and food crops; (2) secondary residues such as saw and pa-
         per mills, food and beverage industries, apricot seed, etc., derived from processing
         biomass material for industrial and food production; (3) tertiary residues such as
         wastes and demolition wood, etc., that are derived from other used biomass materials;
         and (4) energy crops (Bhuiyan et al., 2018).
            Biomass cofiring consists of burning biomass along with coal in coal-fired power
         plants to generate electricity. Biomass cofiring with coal is recognized as one of the
         most attractive short- to medium-term options for using biomass in the power gener-
         ation industry. Solid biomass cofiring involves the combustion of wood chips or pel-
         lets in coal-fired power plants, whereas gas biomass cofiring means the firing of
         gasified biomass with natural gas or pulverized coal (PC) in gas power plants (indirect
         cofiring) (Agbor et al., 2014). In this context, cofiring of biomass with coal may be
         considered a bridge between the energy production systems based on fossil fuels
         and those based on renewable energy sources, which would contribute to reduce
         CO 2 emissions and the dependency on fossil fuels. In addition, the use of biomass
         in combination with coal in the same power plant would avoid the typical problems
         associated with small biomass-fired power plants, i.e., high specific cost (due to the
         larger size of coal power plants) and low efficiency, while at the same time it would
         reduce the risk of a biomass shortage (Valero and Us  on, 2006). Modern coal power
         plants are more efficient than smaller-scale dedicated biomass power plants. There
   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160