Page 245 - New Trends in Eco efficient and Recycled Concrete
P. 245

Life cycle assessment applied to recycled aggregate concrete      213


           allocation principle, for example, by mass value or by economic value. According
           to Chen et al. (2010b) and Chen (2009), the mass allocation coefficients for fly ash,
           blast-furnace slag and silica fume amount to 12.4%, 19.4% and 13%, respectively.
           Given these considerable percentages, enormous environmental impacts are
           imposed this way to the by-products which may discourage the concrete industry to
           use them further on as a cement replacing material (Chen et al., 2010b). By addi-
           tionally accounting for the obvious price difference between main product and by-
           product, economic allocation coefficients are much lower, that is, 1.0%, 2.3% and
           4.8%, respectively (Chen et al., 2010b; Chen, 2009). However, incorporation of the
           price aspect in these percentages automatically implies that they are much less sta-
           ble. Considerable variations are to be expected both in time and by country. For
           instance, these values are representative for France in 2009 10. In Van den Heede
           (2014), economic allocation coefficients were calculated for both fly ash and silica
           fume used in Belgium in 2012 2014. They amounted to 2.9% and 6.1%, respec-
           tively, and are thus considerably higher than the previous ones. Consequently, the
           environmental impacts to be assigned to them will also be significantly higher. The
           expected emissions to air of CO 2 ,SO x ,NO x and dust for fly ash, blast-furnace slag
           and silica fumes using the mass and economic allocation coefficients of Chen et al.
           (2010b) and Chen (2009) have been summarised in Table 9.3.
              Clearly the choice of allocation principle has a huge impact on the emissions to
           be assigned to each of the considered supplementary cementitious materials. When
           looking at CO 2 , mass allocation for fly ash and silica fume implies higher emission
           values than the corresponding ones for ordinary Portland cement. For fly ash and
           silica fume, this problem also seems to exist for SO x and NO x emissions. Economic
           allocation tends to result in a more fair emission contribution for all key emissions,
           except in case of silica fume in terms of CO 2 emissions which is still 1.66 kg/kg.
           Note that the choice between mass and economic allocation is still subject of a lot
           of debate. The most robust and stable approach is mass allocation, yet it imposes
           huge impacts to the supplementary cementitious materials. As this may discourage
           the concrete industry to keep on using these materials as cement replacing material
           and stimulate their landfilling again, it seems not the appropriate way of dealing
           with these by-products. However, economic allocation holds the major disadvantage
           of being highly dependent on price variations in time and by country. However, the


            Table 9.3 CO 2 ,SO x ,NO x and dust emissions to be assigned to 1 kg of fly ash, blast-
            furnace slag and silica fume using the mass and economic allocation coefficients Chen
            et al. (2010b) and Chen (2009)

            1 kg     Fly ash             Blast-furnace slag  Silica fume
            Allocation  Mass   Economic  Mass      Economic  Mass      Economic
            CO 2 (kg)  2.27    0.18      0.69      0.08      4.51      1.66
            SO x (kg)  1.06 3 10 22  0.86 3 10 23  1.08 3 10 24  0.13 3 10 24  1.07 3 10 22  0.39 3 10 22
            NO x (kg)  4.67 3 10 23  0.38 3 10 23  6.45 3 10 25  0.76 3 10 25  8.51 3 10 23  3.14 3 10 23
            Dust (kg)  8.06 3 10 24  0.65 3 10 24  2.59 3 10 25  0.31 3 10 25  6.77 3 10 23  2.50 3 10 23
   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250