Page 486 - New Trends in Eco efficient and Recycled Concrete
P. 486

436                               New Trends in Eco-efficient and Recycled Concrete


         because the technique is sensitive to topographic changes between constituents
         (Peled and Weiss, 2011; Peled, Castro and Weiss, 2013). AFM images show that
         the CSH phase is composed of clusters of grains resulting in relatively rough and
         granular structure (Fig. 14.8A) while CH surface is flat and smooth (Fig. 14.8B)
         (Peled et al., 2013).
           Hydration products containing alumina. Most cement pastes enclose a small quan-
         tity of hydration products containing alumina, including AFt (ettringite) and AFm
         phases (calcium monosulfoaluminate, calcium hemicarboaluminate and calcium
         monocarboaluminate) (Rossen and Scrivener, 2017). Ettringite formed at early ages
         (when ample sulphate is available) crystallises as isolated deposits within the origi-
         nally water-filled space, presenting thin hexagonal needles morphology with less than
         a micron across (Fig. 14.9A) (Scrivener, 2004). It may also recrystallise in pores and
         voids (Fig. 14.9B) where it is visible as large masses (Scrivener, 2004). Ettringite
         presence at later ages is common, but more difficult to identify because the individual
         thin crystals strongly intermingle with outer C S H and CH in the groundmass and
         are, thus, more difficult to recognise. If C3A remains available it can further react
         with ettringite rendering monosulfoaluminate, in the form small compact crystals
         (Fig. 14.9C) or of fine crystals intermixed with C S H. In observation of polished
         sections, it may be difficult to differentiate ettringite from monosulfoaluminate by
         morphology alone. Although ettringite and monosulfoaluminate masses respectively
         show characteristic curved (Fig. 14.9D) and straight (Fig. 14.9E) shrinkage-induced
         crack patterns (Diamond, 2004), this distinction is not always clear. Many times
         microanalysis is necessary to distinguish between the two phases, by comparison of
         the sulphur to aluminium peak intensity ratio (S/Al . 1 for ettringite and S/Al , 1for
         monosulfoaluminate, respectively) (Diamond, 2004).
           Porosity. Hydrated cement is a highly porous material (Abell et al., 1999)includ-
         ing micropores in the 0.5 10 nm range (gel pores) and mesopores in the
         10 nm 5 μm range (capillary pores). Additionally, macropores formed on compac-
         tion and shrinkage cracks are inherent to concrete (Kumar and Bhattacharjee, 2003)














         Figure 14.8 AFM topographic images (3 μm 3 3 μm) of the surface of (A) C S H and
         (B) CH. AFM, Atomic force microscopy.
         Source: Adapted from Peled, A., Castro, J., Weiss, W.J., 2013. Atomic force and lateral force
         microscopy (AFM and LFM) examinations of cement and cement hydration products. Cem.
         Concr. Compos. 36, 48 55.
   481   482   483   484   485   486   487   488   489   490   491