Page 110 - Nightmare Japan Contemporary Japanese Horror Cinema
P. 110

Ghosts of the Present                                    97

                              biological  monsters  either,  this  other-worldly,  mother-centered  family
                              merges  a  dangerous  corporeality  (they  can  physically  attack  and
                              manipulate  their  victim’s  bodies),  with  an  eerie  spectral  quality  without
                              adhering  absolutely  to  one  convention  or  the  other.  Furthermore,  this
                              uncanny  mother  and  son  become  even  more  disturbing,  as  well  as  less
                              exclusively  linked  to  Japanese  horror  cinema,  when  one  factors  in
                              Shimizu’s masterful camera work and brilliant control of the film’s mise-
                              en-scène.
                                     In  keeping  with  ‘classic’  and  contemporary  works  of  Japanese
                              horror,  Shimizu  allows  tension  to  build  slowly,  almost  contemplatively,
                              throughout Ju-on: The Grudge’s numerous, non-linear episodes. Many of
                              the  expected,  culturally  specific  trappings  of  filmic  terror  are  present:
                              long  black  tresses  framing  wide  staring  eyes,  ominous  tatami  shots  of
                              sliding closet doors, shadowy apparitions that render their human victims
                              virtually  paralysed  with  fear.  However,  true  to  his  roots  as  ‘an  eighties
                              splatter  movie  kid’  (Macias  2003,  para 18),  Shimizu  also  incorporates  a
                              slasher/  ‘stalker’  film  aesthetic  throughout  Ju-on:  The  Grudge,  most
                              obviously via the occasional alignment of the viewer’s gaze with not only
                              the  central  protagonist’s  perspective,  but  that  of  Kakayo  and  Toshio  as
                              well.  Such  compositions  and  camera  movement  allows  us,  by  turns,  to
                              ‘stalk’ and ‘be stalked’, a visual motif almost exclusively applied to what
                              Shimizu refers to as ‘splatter movies’ or ‘monster stories’ (para 18). This
                              collision  of  ‘an  American  and  Japanese  style’  (para  18)  creates  a
                              cinematic  hybrid  that  appeals  to  viewers  familiar  with  the  visual
                              iconography and cinematography of both Japanese and US horror cinema.
                                     Lastly, by vacillating between limiting what we see and revealing
                              the  objects  of  our  fear  in  groundbreaking  ways  that  separate  him
                              aesthetically  from  other  directors,  Shimizu  creates  a  text  that  may  very
                              well alter forever the way that some viewers process cinematic horror. By
                              frequently  relegating  frightening  images  to  the  extreme  edges  of  the
                              frame,  as  fleeting,  yet  troubling  figures  glimpsed  peripherally  but  never
                              completely,  Shimizu  artfully  manipulates  the  audience’s  gaze,  creating
                              the  impression  that  we  may  have  just  witnessed  a  flash  of  something
                              disquieting  –  as  if  from  the  corner  of  our  collective  eye.  During  other
                              moments,  most  particularly  the  climactic  sequences that inevitably bring
   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115