Page 358 - Numerical Analysis and Modelling in Geomechanics
P. 358

RESERVOIR COMPACTION, SUBSIDENCE AND WELL DAMAGE 339
            (2) assuming  that  the  vertical  stress  due  to  the  weight  of  the  overburden  does
               not change and
            (3) assuming that the horizontal stresses at the boundaries do not change.

            These  assumptions  are  those  for  the  condition  of  plane  strain  and  lead  to  the
            following expression for the compaction (i.e., the change in thickness), ≥ h, of the
            reservoir with initial thickness h or a rock sample of height h:

                                                                       (11.33)

            where  C m  is  referred  to  as  the  one-dimensional  compressibility  or  uniaxial
            compaction coefficient:


                                                                       (11.34)


            Typical deep-water Gulf of Mexico (GOM) reservoirs have been reported to be
            composed  of  unconsolidated  to  slightly  consolidated  Miocene,  Pliocene  and
            Pleistocene  age  turbidite  sands. 74  These  sands  are  prone  to  compaction,  since
            they  are  young  and  under-consolidated. 62  Martin  and  Serdengecti 75  presented
            data on the bulk compressibility of unconsolidated sandstones ranging from about
            0.7  to  7.0  µ  sips,  they  also  reported  that  C m  ranges  from  0.45C bc  to  C .  As  a
                                                                      bc
            further approximation, if C  is assumed to be much less than C , then C  has an
                                                                      m
                                  r
                                                              bc
            effect on C  that is a function only of Poisson’s ratio. If Poisson’s ration ranges
                     bc
            from 0.2 to 0.45 for consolidated to unconsolidated rock, then C  ranges from 0.
                                                               m
            5C  to 0.88C .
              bc
                       bc
                          Nonlinear, elastic-plastic constitutive model
            Failure of rocks and soils under shear stress is well known and understood. 1,76,77
            For reservoir rocks, depletion of pore pressure results in increased stress carried
            by the rock matrix, reduction of pore volume, and possibly pore collapse. High
            porosity, weakly cement rocks are most susceptible to pore collapse. 74,78–80  On
            the  micro-scale,  pore  collapse  is  the  result  of  the  failure  of  bonds  between
            particles  and  the  subsequent  rearrangement  of  the  particles.  Under  sufficiently
            high  stress  and  associated  high  volumetric  strain,  rock  grains  can  fracture  or
            become  fragmented,  a  situation  not  often  encountered  in  soils  due  to  the
            relatively lower overburden stress near to the Earth’s surface. For clastic rocks
            with  weak  grain  bonds,  shear  stress  can  enhance  compaction  by  the
            rearrangement  of  intact  or  fragmented  particles.  Pore  collapse  results  in
            unrecoverable  deformation  and  thus  plasticity  theories  are  amenable  to
            developing a constitutive model. One such model, which has been used widely
            and  successfully  for  both  soils  and  rocks,  is  the  generalized  cap  model  of
   353   354   355   356   357   358   359   360   361   362   363