Page 408 - Orlicky's Material Requirements Planning
P. 408

CHAPTER 22      Blueprint for the Future: Demand-Driven MRP Logic               387


        owing to the shortcomings listed earlier, this leads many manufacturing personnel with-
        in companies to think that they should ignore MRP. In fact, a frequent milestone for a lean
        or DBR implementation is that the computer planning system has been eliminated or
        effectively marginalized.
             On the other hand, from a planning and purchasing perspective, companies must
        have a way to see, plan, synchronize, and manage the availability of all materials, compo-
        nents, and end items effectively. This is especially true for critical and/or long-lead-time
        manufactured and purchased parts. With today’s increasingly complex planning scenar-
        ios (discussed earlier), it leads planning personnel to insist on using MRP. A common reac-
        tion to an expressed desire to ignore or turn off MRP leads to a fairly common reaction by
        planning personnel: “You think it’s bad now? Wait ‘till we turn it off—we will be flying
        completely blind.” The person who made the suggestion immediately loses credibility
        with the planning side of the organization, which view the suggestion as one based on
        oversimplification driven by a lack of fundamental understanding of materials planning.
             However, both the opposing perspectives are correct. This is why the conflict is so
        pervasive and chronic. The more complex the manufacturing environment, the more
        acute this conflict tends to be. The inability to reconcile the dilemma in those environ-
        ments effectively leads to the ineffective MRP compromises categorized earlier and also
        will relegate lean, DBR, and Six-Sigma implementations to lip service. This completely
        squanders their potential and the time, effort, and money already put into them.
             The business requirements that are driving both sides of the dilemma must be
        achieved without the conventional inaccuracy, inconsistency, and massive additional
        efforts and waste associated with the current set of compromises. If companies want to
        be agile, there is no other way.


        DEMAND-DRIVEN MRP INTRODUCTION
        MRP, as noted earlier in this book, has some very valuable core attributes in today’s more
        complex planning and supply scenarios (e.g., bill of material visibility, netting capability,
        and maintenance of sales order/work order connection between demand allocations and
        open supply). In other words, critical aspects of it are still relevant—perhaps even more
        relevant than in the past four decades. The key is to keep those attributes but eliminate
        MRP’s critical shortcomings while integrating the pull-based replenishment tactics and
        visibility behind today’s demand-driven concepts into one system in a dynamic and
        highly visible format. The solution is called demand-driven MRP (DDMRP).
             DDMRP builds from the still relevant foundations of Orlicky’s MRP. It takes advan-
        tage of advances in technology over the past 60 years, as well as incorporating innovative
        new logic with regard to the lead-time compression required to achieve and sustain a com-
        petitive advantage in the demand-driven world. In addition to these innovations, DDMRP
        leverages the complete toolbox, including core MRP and distribution requirements plan-
        ning (DRP) logic, theory of constraints (TOC), and lean principles. Figure 22-2 illustrates
        this fusion. A list of new terms is available in Appendix C at the end of this book.
   403   404   405   406   407   408   409   410   411   412   413