Page 255 - Packed bed columns for absorption, desorption, rectification and direct heat transfer
P. 255

245



                                  Ranun [96] accepted that using in Rei the effective surface area a e
                           instead of the total packing area a is more grounded theoretically, but according
                           to him it is difficult to use this area because of absence of any equation for its
                           calculation in case of liquid-side controlled processes. Later Kolev [34]
                           discussed the problem and considered that the existing of different effective
                           surface areas for different processes is impossible at least because in most of the
                           cases the mass transfer depended on the resistance of the two phases. That is, if
                           mass is transferred thought a part of the effective surface area in the gas phase,
                           it has to be transferred in the liquid phase too. I.e. the effective surface area is
                           the same for each of the phases. The good coincidence of the experimental data
                           for a e, obtained using the methods of Danckwerts controlled by the rate of the
                           chemical reaction and of Shulman with gas-side controlled process, also gives a
                           proof for the mentioned above.
                                  Using equation (105) for determination of the effective surface area and
                           experimental data for the packings presented in Table 21, Kolev [34] obtained
                           the equation:


                           Sh L = 0.030                                                     (153)


                           where Sh L and G% are determined with the packing size d p.
                                  The comparison between the experimental data for the packings
                           presented in Table 21 and the line calculated by equation (153) is presented in
                           Fig. 38.



                                                 2                    -20 ^.
                                                                        B
                                                 to                  '**• <
                                                 8            m      ^=20°/
                                              a   f
                                                   ft'
                                                  7
                                                   Iff       4 i 8 10*



                           Fig. 38. Comparison between the experimental data for the packings presented in Table 21 and
                           the line calculated by equation (153).
   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260