Page 140 - Percolation Models for Transport in Porous Media With
P. 140

134               CHAPTER 7.  PARAMETERS OF FRACTURED ROCKS


          goes up abruptly.  Therefore reliable determination of the function nd(ds)  is  pos-
          sible only for  those fracture traces whose half-lengths are not too large compared
          to the radius of the core (ds  < R').
             For further calculations, it is convenient to introduce a normalized distribution
          function

                                                                            (7.10)


             Consider a  disk fracture of radius Tt  whose mouth is  negligible.  It is  easy to
         show that by reasons similar to those mentioned in deriving the relationship (7.3),
          the probability of this fracture leaving on the cross-section a trace of length 2d 8  is
         equal to
                                    P(d)-       ds
                                            Tt  rt  -  s
                                       8   -  J 2   d2
         Let F(rt) be the normalized radius probability density function for disk fractures.
         In this case the probability of the length of a trace on the surface of an arbitrary
         cross-section to lie in the interval 2d 8 +  2{ d 8 +  l:1d 8 )  is determined by the expression


                                                                            (7.11)



         In deriving the formula (7.11 ), it was taken into account that a fracture with radius
         less than ds  cannot leave a trace of length d 8  on a plane.
            The integral equation of the first type {7.11) establishes the correlation between
         the experimentally measured  function  f(ds)  and  the function  F(rt)  which  is  to
         be  determined.  Since  such  equations  represent  examples  of ill-posed  problems,
         their  numerical  solutions  on  computer  are  unstable.  In  the  special  case  when
         the function  f(ds)  and  its  derivative  are continuous  and  bounded,  the solution
         of the equation {7.10)  can be obtained in  the explicit form.  Aside from  the fact
         that the obtaining of an  analytical solution of the equation  (7.10)  is  of separate
         mathematical interest,  it  is  also  very  important in  the methodological aspect of
         the considered application.  The exact analytical solution, unlike an approximate
         numerical one, is stable.  Since the outlined limitations on the function  f(d 8 )  are
         satisfied by the majority of functions obtained in experiment, this solution can be
         used as a stable technique for the processing of a broad set of probability density
         functions for traces of fractures on the core.
            Make  the  following  change  of variables  in  (7.10),  rt 1   =  t.  As  a  result,  we
         obtain
                                           d-1
                                            •      1
                                 f( d  ) =  d  I F(C  ) dt                 (7.12)
                                    8     8   vf1- fP..t2
                                           0         8
   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145