Page 143 - Percolation Models for Transport in Porous Media With
P. 143

7.3  EXPERIMENTAL DATA PROCESSING                                    137


                                    y!
                                     I

                                    10


                                    5

                                    D '--''----'-----L-2.1-:11,..-1;."'
           Figure 51:  Histogram of the fracture trace concentration on the core surface










                                  1,5.___...._ _  _._ _  _,
                                    1,Q   U   2,1/  ~ds>,CM
         Figure 52:  Plot of the graphical solution  to a system of algebraic equations for
         the determination of the concentration and the average size of fracture traces



         be  taken  into  account.  However  in  practice  it  is  more  convenient  to  solve  the
         overdetermined systems of linear equations (7.18}  graphically.
            The  linear  relations  (7.18}  constructed  for  different  values  of ai  and  bi  are
         presented in  fig.  52.  Intersection points of these lines  define  the quantities n;t 1
         and  < d.  >.  It can  be seen  from  the plot  in  fig.  52  that the quantities na  and
         < d. > are determined up to some error which can be estimated straight from the
         plot.  The following average values were found,  na = 0.4 em  -t, < d 8  >= 1.8 em.
         Consequently the volumetric concentration of disk fractures n• = 0.16 cm- 3  and
         their average radius, < Tt >= 2.3 em.
            To find  the length distribution function of fractures, the number of the traces,
         from  a  given  length  interval,  on  the surface of the core inside a  circle of radius
         R'  = 5  em  was  determined.  Averaging  over  72  faces  of the  studied  specimen
         yielded the function Na(ds)  (fig.  53}.  Then the distribution f(d 8 )  was determined
         from  formula  (7.10},  taking  account  of (7.9}.  The  histogram  of the  half-length
         distribution of fracture traces is presented in fig.  54, a.  The approximating rela-
         tion,  which  is close to exponential,  is  marked with a dotted line.  The results of
         determining the probability density function F(rt) according to the formula (7.16)
         are presented in fig.  54, b.
            Note  that  the  function  f(d 8 )  and,  consequently,  F(rt)  are determined  ade-
   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148