Page 170 - Petroleum Geology
P. 170

147

            TABLE 1-4

            Zipf  predictions  based  on East  Texas field as Rank 1 (column 1) and Rank  2 (column 2);
            figures in column 3 assume  that  Prudhoe Bay was next discovery. Other figures are Rank
            1 divided by rank number. Figures in millions of  barrels
            Rank          Actual        1              2             3

             1             5600          5600          11,200         9600
             2             2500          2800           5600          4800
             3             2334          1867           3733          3200
             4             2100          1400           2800          2400
             5             1773          1120           2240          1920
             6             1683           933           1867          1600
             I             1647           800           1600          1371
             8             1318           700           1400          1200
             9             1303           622           1244           1067
            10             1205           560           1120           96  0
            Total         21,463        16,402         32,804        28,118


              It  can  hardly  be  said  that  Zipf’s  law is yet a law that describes the size
            distribution of  oil fields  very well, but it is an interesting way of  looking at
            the statistics. Bearing in mind that there is a tendency  to rank oil fields too
            highly, with too small a rank number, and to underestimate the ultimate re-
            coverable reserves  in them, we  can perhaps improve on the estimate of  the
            Zipf  constant.  Note how the value of this constant on the 1968 information
            in Table 7-3 tends to increase with increasing rank, suggesting that in the largest
            fields, the rank number is too small or the reserve estimate too small, or both.
            A value of  12 X  lo9 bbl for this constant in North America could still prove
            to be a good value.
              We  can extend the argument, following Folinsbee (1977), to estimate the
            world’s ultimate total recoverable oil. Let us assume that the sum of the har-
            monic series approaches  12, with about  100,000 accumulations that could
            be produced economically. These numbers are not very sensitive: for 50,000,
            it is 11.4, so Ranks 50,000 to 100,000 would only contribute about 5% to
            the total. The ultimate recoverable reserves are given  by  the product of  this
            number  and  the  Zipf  constant  for  the  world.  Taking the Zipf  constant to
            be  the  largest  suggested by  the  world’s top-ranking  ten  oil  fields  in  1968
            (Table 7-5, from Halbouty et al., 1970, Table I, facing p. 504), as a conservative
            figure,  the  indicated  ultimate  recoverable  reserves  are  probably  at  least
            120 X  lo9 X  12 = 1450 X  lo9 bbl. If  the Zipf constant is really about 150 X
            lo9 bbl, the ultimate recoverable reserves will be about 1800 X  lo9 bbl.
   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175