Page 113 - Contribution To Phenomenology
P. 113

106               MAXINE   SHEETS-JOHNSTONE

              the  mandala,  and  that  briefly.  I  leave  the  evil  eye  for  a  future  time."

                                              V


              Jung  tells  us  that  the  Sanskrit  word  "mandala"  means  circle  and  that
              where  used  in  rituals,  it  is  "an  instrument  of  contemplation,"  an
              instrument  that  "is  meant  to  aid  concentration  by  narrowing  down  the
              psychic field of  vision  and  restricting  it  to  the  centre." He  goes  on  to  say
              that  the  circles  which  describe  the  mandala  "are  meant  to  shut  out  the
              outside  and  hold  the  inside  together."^  The  initial  question  is,  how  did
              mandalas  originate?  Where  did  the concept of  a  mandala  come ft'om? If
              we  look  to  the  body  as  a  semantic  template,  then  a  spatio-teleological
              similarity  is  immediately  apparent.  The  mystic  circle  that  is  the  mandala
              is  spatially  patterned  on  that  original  mystic  circle  that  is  the  eye.  The
              teleological  correspondence  is  borne  out  in  the  fact  that  the  eye  is  both
              the  original  "instrument  of  contemplation"  and  the  instrument  par
              excellence  that  aids  our  concentration  by  focusing  our  attention.  In
              contemplation,  the  eye  shuts  out  the  outside  and  holds  the  inside
              together—by  literally  closing  itself,  for  example,  by  intentionally  avoiding
              other  eyes  or  other  objects,  or  by  glazing  itself,  thus  keeping  the  world
              of  things  at  bay.  Mandalas  are  circular  forms  morphologically  and
              teleologically  modeled  on  the  image  of  eyes.
                The  similarity  is  thus  not  a  mere  surface  similarity.  Moreover  the
              mandala  is  generally  interpreted  as  a  symbol  of  the  self  and  of  the
              cosmos.  It  is  in  fact  an  aesthetic  instantiation  of  the  correspondence
             between  self  and  world,  microcosm  and  macrocosm.  It  is,  in  effect,  a
              "psychocosmogram.*^  To  understand  how  the  circular  form  that  is  the




             Jung—have  related  the  Mandala  to  other  cultures  and  traditions,  no  one  has
             developed  a  concept  of  its  universality  to  any  extent."  As  the  present  paper  will
             show,  what  is  needed  is  a  phenomenological  analysis  that  recognizes  and  elucidates
              the  psychophysical  unity  of  the  mandala.
                ^^ An  initial  analysis  of  the  evil  eye  was  given  as  part  of  a  paper  presented  at
             a  panel  session  titled  "The  Corporeal  Turn,"  Society  for  Phenomenology  and
             Existential  Philosophy,  Boston,  October  1992.
                ^  Carl  G.  Jung,  The  Archetypes  and  the  Collective  Unconscious,  2nd  ed.,
              translated  by  R.  F.  C.  Hull,  BoUingen  Series  XX  (Princeton:  Princeton  University
             Press,  1968),  356.
                ^^ Giuseppe  Tucci,  The  Theory and  Practice of  the  Mandala,  translated  by  Alan
             H.  Brodrick  (London:  Rider  &  Company,  1961),  25.
   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118