Page 114 - Contribution To Phenomenology
P. 114

THE BODY AS    PAN-CULTURAL      UNIVERSAL          107

              mandala  and  that  is  patterned  on  the  eye  came  to  stand  for  the  self  and
              the  world  is  first  of  all  to  experience  eyes  as  channels  through  which  a
              dual  light  is  cast,  that  is,  as  windows  on  two  worlds,  as  openings  on  a
              luminosity  both within  and without.  What  needs  clarification  is  how  those
              dual  experiential  possibiUties  of  eye-light  take  on  the  specific  symbolic
              import  that  they  do  in  the  mandala.
                That  the  language  in  which  the  power  of  the  eye  is  described  is
              consistently  anchored  in  images  of  light  is  readily  tied  to  the  original
              experience  of  the  eye  as  an  organ of  Ught.  From  the  fact  that  I open  my
              eyes  and  it  is  light  comes  the  possibility  of  my  being  enlightened.  The
              archetypal  power  of  the  eye  to  inform  and  edify  is  thus  linked  to
              clarification,  to  elucidation,  and  so  on.  That  the  metaphoric  language  in
              which  the  powers  of  the  mandala  are  described  is  also  consistently
              anchored  in  images  of  light  is  an  indication  of  a  further  symbolic
              extension  from  original  experience.  This  further  symbolic  structuring  is
              evident  in  the  equation  of  light  with  consciousness.  There  is,  in  other
              words,  a  cognate  relationship  among  light,  consciousness,  mandala,  and
              eye,  eye  being  the  root  form.  Thus, the  language  of  consciousness  is  also
              the  language  of  light.  Furthermore, like  the  center  of  the  eye  that  reflects
              light  and  like  a  luminous  consciousness  that  is  a  center  of  light,  so  also
              the  center  of  the  mandala  radiates  Ught  Of  striking  interest  in  this
              context  is  Husserl's  language  in  describing  the  Ego.  "It  is  the  center,''  he
             writes,  **whence  all  conscious  life  emits  rays and  receives them''  (italics
              added).^  It  is  emphatically  clear  from  Husserl's  descriptive  analyses  that
              Objects  as  well  as  the  Ego  radiate  Ught,  and  that  the  epistemological
              relationship  between  Ego  and  Object  is  simUarly  structured  in  images  of
              Ught.  Husserl  speaks,  for  example,  of  "two-fold  radiations,  running ahead
              and  running back: fi*om the  center  outward, through the  acts  toward  their
              Objects,  and  again  returning  rays,  coming  from  the  Objects  back  toward
              the  center  in  manifold  changing phenomenological characters."^^ Over  and
             over  again,  the  original  source  of  those  two-fold  radiations  is  described
             as  a  center,  a  center  that  Husserl  says  is  analogous to  the  body as  center
             of  aU  sensory  awareness.^^
                Now  before  continuing  with  the  descriptive  analysis  of  mandalas  as  a
             symboUc  extension  of  the  archetypal  power  of  eyes,  it  is  apposite  at  this


                ^  Ideas  II,  112.
                '^ Ibid,
                '^ Ibid,
   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119