Page 118 - Contribution To Phenomenology
P. 118

THE BODY AS    PAN-CULTURAL      UNIVERSAL          111

              tiones  that  comprehend  it.  Eastern  meditational  practices  bear  out  the
              kinship.  "Just  sitting"  produces  insight^'
                Now  this  archetypal  mode  of  self-  and  world-understanding is  at  odds
              with  typical  20th  century  Western  modes  of  understanding,  modes  in
              which  eyes  have  lost  touch  with  their  archetypal  power  to  see  into  the
              dark.  They  have  become  merely  observant  eyes.  They  are  eyes  that  are
              busy  gathering  information,  measuring,  quantifying,  inspecting,  surveying,
              looking,  watching.  They  are  eyes  that  are  perpetually  on  the  move,  and
              on  the  edge  rather  than  at  the  center.  They  are  eyes  of  a  piece  with
              bodies that are  mere  culturally-inscribed surfaces.  They are  eyes  that have
              lost  sight  of  their  potential  to  see  into  the  nature  of  things.  To  see  into
              the  nature  of  things  requires  a  sense  of  their  inwardness.  It  requires  a
              sense  of  the  life  of  the  thing  that  one  is  looking  at.  In  the  words  of  a
              long  misunderstood  but  ultimately  Nobel-recognized  cytogeneticist  (whose
              work  was  on  a  most  lowly  form  of  plant  life—corn,  the  plant  equivalent
              of  fruit  flies),  it  requires  "a  feeling  for  the  organism."^^ A  feeling  for  the
              organism. A  feeling  for  stone  tools. A  feeling  for  geometry.  A  feeling  for
              perception.  A  feeling  for  the  body.  With  particular  respect  to  the  object,
              the  relationship  Husserl  describes  between  Ego  and  Object  is  precisely
              akin  to  "a  feeling  for  the  organism."  Eyes  that  lack  a  feeling  for  the
              organism no  longer bring with  them a  resonant  and open  sensibility. They
              are  mere  receptor  organs.  Poised  in  their  sockets,  they  look  at  what  is
              before  them  and  duly  record  its  properties;  they watch  what  they see  and
              duly  record  its  reactions.  All  of  those  optics  of  power  of  which  Foucault
              writes  are  generated  on  the  basis  of  just  such  factual  and  fact-seeking
              eyes.  Such eyes  have  all  the  living juice  squeezed  out of  them  and  cannot
              fathom  being  inside.  They  cannot  see  into  the  nature  of  things;  they
              cannot see  into  darkness,  neither  their  own  nor  that  of  the  object  before
              them.
                The  two  distinct  sets  of  eyes  return  us  directly  to  the  themes  of  the
              symposium. To work  through the  body as  animate  form, as  psychophysical
              organism,  attending  to  experience  and  providing  corporeal  analyses  of




                 *'  See  Shigenori  Nagatomo's  "An  Analysis  of  Dogen's  'Casting  Off  Body  and
              Mind',"  International  Philosophical  Quarterly 27.3  (September  1987):  227-242.  See
              also  his  "An  Eastern  Concept  of  the  Body:  Yuasa's  Body-Scheme,"  in  Giving the
             Body  Its  Due,  edited  by  Maxine  Sheets-Johnstone,  48-68.
                ^^ See  Evelyn  Fox  Keller's  A  Feeling for  the  Organism: The  Life  and  Work of
             Barbara  McCtintock  (New  York:  W.  H.  Freeman  &  Co.,  1983).
   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123