Page 198 - Contribution To Phenomenology
P. 198

PHILOSOPHY AND      ECOLOGICAL     CRISIS          191

             wisdom  seems  to  be  the  same  as  to  be  poor  in  philosophy  if  philosophy
              is  what  its  name  says:  love,  search  and  care  for  wisdom.
                This  wisdom,  I  think,  has  to  be  something  rather  close  to  Husserl's
              phenomenological  reason  but  purified  from  its  Eurocentric  and  absolutist
              connotations.  It  will  be  something  between  arbitrary  and  idiosyncratic
             world-views  and  a  rigorous  science  and  so  come  close  to  Naess'
              conception  of  a  total  view.  It  will  incorporate  firstly  an  understanding as
              comprehensive,  as  radical  and  as  deep  as  possible  of  the  character  and
              of  the  roots  and  causes  of  our  present  predicament,  secondly  a
              metaphysics  and  anthropology,  and  thirdly,  grounded  in  the  foregoing,  a
              normative  vision  about  the  future  course  of  human  history.  These
              integrated  disciplines  of  wisdom have  to be  developed  in an open-minded,
             non-dogmatic,  self-critical  and  communicative  inquiry  beyond  the  narrow
             bounds  of  positivistic  science.  This  inquiry  will  be  phenomenological  in
             two  ways:
                1.  It will  not be  calculative  and  constructive,  quantifying  and  modelling
             but  it  will  rather be  intuitive, meditative  and  hermeneutical.  It will  ground
             its  knowledge-claims  in  intuitive  evidence  and  reasoning.
                2.  It  will  not  be  objectivistic.  Instead  it  will  be  fundamentally  sub-
             ject-oriented,  engaged  in  a  continuous  process  of  self-examination,
             self-interpretation  and  self-knowledge.
                To  raise  the  question  of  wisdom  is  equivalent  to  raising  the  question
             of  the  subject.  And  if  there  is  a  point  towards  which  the  fragmentary
             considerations  in  this  article  converge,  it  is  the  crucial  importance  of  this
             question.  It  may  be,  as  Bahro  remarks,  that  we  need  something  like  an
             act  of  grace  to  help  us.  But  grace  is  something  like  a  field  of  spiritual
             energy  which  needs  to  be  charged  from  our  side  as  well.  "A  society  of
             depressive  junkies  will  not  be  met  by  grace."^  The  avalanche  has  to  be
             stopped—miraculously—from  the  inside.  As  Ivan  Illich  said  so  succinctly:
             "To  face  the  future  freely,  one  must  give  up  both  optimism  and
             pessimism  and  place  all  hope  in  human  beings,  not  tools."^^










                  ^  Rudolf  Bahro,  Die  Logik  der  Rettung,  307.
                  *^  Ivan  Illich,  "The  Shadow  our  Future  Throws,"  interview  in New Perspectives
             Quarterly, 6  (Spring  1989),  23.
   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203