Page 229 - Contribution To Phenomenology
P. 229

222        STANFORD     M,  LYMAN & LESTER     EMBREE

                 There  are,  hence,  two  acculturative  challenges—^viz.,  an  assimilation
              challenge  that,  as  a  poUtical  policy  and  a  social  and  cultural  process, will
              foster  national  unity within a  Capitalist-industrial  society,  and  the  Marxist
              variant  of  assimilation  that  is  going  to  facilitate  the  onset  of  a  conflict-
              ridden  class  structured  society.  Park  defined  assimilation  as  a  "co-
              ordination  of  sentiments." I  have  interpreted  this  to  mean,  among  other
              things,  the  coming  into  existence  of  a  people  claiming  a  common
              historical  heritage,  a  process  described  in  the  motto  found  on  the
              American  dollar  bill,  "E  pluribus  unum." In  plain  language,  this  process
              of  assimilation  is  indicated  when,  for  example,  the  "founding  fathers"
              recognized  by, say, a  Chinese American,  are  George  Washington, Thomas
              Jefferson,  and  Benjamin  Franklin, just  as  they  are  for a  W. A  S.  P.  They
              share  founding  fathers;  that  shows  both  are  assimilated.
                /  think that genetic  explanations  are extremely popular in  common-sense
              as well as scientific  understanding.  You explain  what something is by  telling
              why and  how it grows,  where  it  came from or sprouted,  etc. I  don't know
              if  all  societies do  it.  It  may  come  from  agricultural  life. Nevertheless,  in
              our  common-sense  we  often proceed  this  way. And  what  strikes me  as
              related to  this is how  when we have, at  least in  the  academic context, a
              group of  insurgents,  the first thing they want  to  do  is  discover or  recover
              their history,  e.g..  Women's History,  Black History.  History  is part  of making
              and  building  group identity,  establishing  that  we  are who  we  are  because
              we came from some particular  source.  This  source provides the root of the
             group's heritage.  Sometimes,  this is done through  confecting an origin  myth.
                Perhaps  this  is  a  good  place  to  introduce a  conceptual  distinction  that
              "the  Durkheim  School"  introduced.  Emile  Durkheim  (1858-1917)  and
              Marcel  Mauss  (1872-1950),  his  nephew  and  colleague,  differentiated
              between  "civilization" and  "culture."  Civilizations  are  cultural  expressions
              that  transcend  geo-political  boundaries.  Christianity,  for  example,  is  a
              civilizational  phenomenon,  as  is  Buddhism.  I  would  argue,  and  I  suspect
              that  Durkheim  would  agree,  that  the  cultures  that  grew  up  from  the
              European  seaborne  empires,  the  Spanish,  Dutch,  French,  English,  etc.,
              are  civilizational,  institutional  ways  of  thinking,  believing,  and  behaving
              that  moved  beyond  their  original  "national"  boundaries.  For  Durkheim
              and  Mauss,  "culture" was  a  term  that  referred  to  those  ways  of  life  and
              thought  that  were  bounded  geo-politically.
                From  this  point  of  view,  the  dilemma  of  culture  and  civilization
              provides  the  basis  for  one  problem  of  ethnicity  in  America.  Thus,  for
              example,  in  America,  Mexican-Americans,  Puerto  Rican-Americans,
   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234