Page 233 - Contribution To Phenomenology
P. 233

226        STANFORD     M  LYMAN & LESTER      EMBREE

              celebrates  the  Enlightenment ideal  of  the  individual by making  it  the  unit
              to  be  investigated.  However,  sociologists  have  rarely  treated  the  socius  as
              a  "person" in  the  American  Constitutional sense,  i.e.,  one  who is  entitled
              to  due  process  and  the  equal  protection  of  the  laws,  regardless  of  status,
              race,  color,  or  religion.^^  Examination  of  the  socius  sought  to  show  the
              relationship of  that  unit to  other  units  in  an  aggregate.  Thus, a  particular
              socius  shares  a  status  or  an  attitude  with  another  socius  by  reason  of  his
              or  her  race  or  generation  or  other  measurable  characteristics.  Thus
              quantification  could  be  seen  as  advancing  the  project  of  the  Enlighten-
              ment—except,  that  the  emergence  of  the  individual  as  an  entity
              independent of all  ascriptive  associations is something  that has never been
              found.  Nor  has  that  status  been  investigated  thoroughly.
                But  there  was  an  essay  written  in  1955  by  Leonard  Broom  and  John
              Kitsuse,  two sociologists, called  "The Validation of  Acculturation,"^^ Their
              essay  asked  the  question.  How  would  one  recognize  a  fully  acculturated
              person?  Their  answer,  which  I  beUeve  resonates  with  American  as-
              similationist  approaches,  was  this:  An  acculturated  person  would  be  one
              who  could  neither  credit  nor  blame  his  or  her  status  in  society  on
              anything  inherited,  on  his  or  her  race,  ethnicity,  or  religion.  Such  a
              person  would  have  to  boast  about  individual  merit  or  lament  the  lack  of
              same. It's all a matter of individual merit and accomplishment  Exactly. So
              it's  neither  transmitted culturally nor  biologically hereditary? Yes,  the
              acculturated  person  could  not  say,  "Fm  Black  and  that's  why I  didn't get
              a  good  job," or  "I'm  Jewish  and  that's  why  .  .  .  J' Or Fm  the  son  of  a
              rich  man  and  for  that  reason  have  had  many  advantages.  The  full
              validation  was  the  emergence  of  the  meritocratic  individual,  who  would
              have  to  stand  or  fall  by  claiming  "If  I  did  not  get  the  job, I  guess  I  was
              not  good  enough." Of  course  their  theory  assumed  that  the  society  would
              have  eliminated  all  biases  based  on  birth,  heredity,  race,  color,  and
              heritage.
                If one  looks at  Parsonian sociology, i.e.,  the  perspective  associated  with
              the  late  Talcott Parsons  (1902-1979),  America's  ideal  is summed  up  in the


                  ^^ See  Stanford  M.  Lyman,  "Race  Relations  as  Social  Process:  Sociology's
              Resistance  to  a  Civil  Right's  Orientation,"  in  Race  in  America:  The  Struggle for
             Equality,  edited  by  Herbert  Hill  and  James  E.  Jones,  Jr.,  (Madison:  University  of
              Wisconsin  Press,  1993),  370-401.
                  ^^ Leonard  Broom  and  John  Kitsuse,  "The  Validation  of  Acculturation:  A
              Condition  of  Ethnic  Assimilation," American Anthropologist 57  (February  1955),  44-
              48.
   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238