Page 236 - Contribution To Phenomenology
P. 236

ETHNIC STUDIES     AS  MULTI-DISCIPLINE            229

              an oligarchy  of Euro-American  ethnic groups jointly lording  it over the  little
              more than 20%  of  the whole population in  the so-called  minorities,^^
                 The core of  this ethnic  oligarchy  are the  W^S,P.s,  who stem from  the
              older English,  Dutch, and  German  settlers  of  the North  East going  back  to
              the  17th  Century and  seem  to  have  developed some  racial and cultural
              homogeneity  that sets them off both from  the European  groups they came
              from and from  the Southern  European,  Slav, and Mediterranean  as  well as
              of course  the Native American  and African American  groups that have  been
             present for  a  comparable  duration,  not  to  speak of  more recent  immigra-
              tions. Probably the Low  Land  Scottish  fit  easily into the  WASPs,  but  not
              the  Highlanders  and  Irish who  are  not  only  Celtic  but  Catholic, Now,
              however, in  discussions  about  America,  'White" almost  always  signifies
              "non-Black,  non-Hispanic,  non-Indian,  non-Asian," Perhaps now the wealthy
              Hispanics—of New Mexico,  for  example—are  as  much into  the  hegemony
              as  the  Italians  were in  the  1950s, Nevertheless,  if  we  look  more closely
             America  has  hundreds of  ethnic groups. There would  appear to  be  this
              grand coalition  against  the others,  the latter regarded  as  the more  different
              ones. The 'Whites" suppress their internal differences,  while  they intensify  the
              differences  distinguishing  them  from  the  "others,"  Thus  they  evoke  an
              us-them  structure.
                The  foremost  scholar  among  the  ethno-racially  concerned  post-mod-
              ernists  in  America  is  Henry  Louis  Gates,  Jr.,  at  Harvard.^* He  has  posed
              two  problems.  One  I  just  mentioned,  is  concerned  with  how  to  dis-pri-
              vilege  what  is  called  the  White  canon  and  to  neo-privilege  or  "canonize"
              the  as  yet  unrecognized  complement  of  Black  texts.  However,  the  nature
              of  what  he  wishes  to  include  in  the  Black  canon  requires  that  he  adopt
              an  even  more  complex  post-modernist  orientation.  One  the  one  hand, he
              wishes  to  claim  that  what  appears  to  Whites  and  to  sophisticated  Blacks
              as  vulgar  Black  speech,  ghetto  patois,  and  the  argot  of  the  inner  city
              slums,  is  in  fact  a  literary  expression  that  on  proper  examination  ought
              to  be  regarded  as  canon-worthy.  On  the  other  hand, he  wishes  to  subject



                  ^^  See  the  entries  on  the  hundreds  of  ethnic  groups  that  reside  in  the  United
              Sates  in  Stephan  Thernstrom,  ed., Harvard Encyclopedia of American  Ethnic  Groups
              (Cambridge:  The  Belkap  Press  of  Harvard  University  Press,  1980).
                  ^^  See  three  works  by  Henry  Louis  Gates,  Jr.: Figures  in Black:  Words,  Signs,
              and  the  "Racial'' Self  (New  York:  Oxford  University  Press,  1987);  The Signifying
             Monkey: A  Theory of Afro-American Criticism, (New  York:  Oxford  University  Press,
              1988);  and  Loose  Canons: Notes  on  the  Culture Wars (New  York:  Oxford  University
              Press,  1992).
   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241