Page 235 - Contribution To Phenomenology
P. 235

228        STANFORD     M  LYMAN & LESTER      EMBREE

              can  neither  get  ahead,  despite  their  efforts,  nor  can  they  afford  the
              luxury  of  being  lazy  and  promiscuous.  This  is  how  Parsons  accounts  for
              anti-Semitism  and  race  prejudice  having  become  features  of  Western
              civilization  and  its  discontents.  His  approach  entails  a  sociological
              Freudianism:  It  is  rooted  in  the  idea  that  Occidental  meritocratic
              civilization  is  inherently  frustrating  and  that  its  frustration  will  lead  to
              racist  and  anti-semitic  aggression.
                /  don't  have  to  ask  you  about  the  qualitative-interpretive  perspective
              because your whole  approach,  indicated  here,  illustrates  it  But, I  know you
              have  of  late  been reading in  the  works of  the  Post-Modernists,  trying to
             figure  that perspective out, trying to respond  to it, trying to extract  what good
             you  can find  in  it. Is Postmodernism  a force in Ethnic Studies  today?
                Postmodernism  has  taken  on  an  American  form.  It  has  suited  itself  to
              the  problems  we  have  been  discussing,  more  specifically,  the  dilemma  of
              how,  on  the  one  hand,  there  could  arise  a  justified  ethno-cultural
              renaissance,  and  how,  on  the  other  hand,  the  several  renascent  eth-
              no-racial  minorities  will fit  themselves  into  American  society,  with  all  the
              rights  and  privileges  accorded  thereunto.  What  the  ethnoracially  oriented
              post-modernists—and, I  should  add,  there  are  not  many  of  them  but  the
              few  make  up  in  brilliance  what  they  lack  in  numbers—do  is  borrow  the
              theme  of  dis-privileging  texts  from  Jacques  Derrida,  the  father  of
              Deconstructionism.  But,  they  have  not  taken  up  the  universal  dis-privileg-
              ing  that  is  inherent  in  Derrida's  fundamental  position.  Instead,  they  will
              borrow  the  deconstructive  approach  as a  critique  in  order  to  dis-privilege
              the  hegemonic  texts  of  the  WASP  cultures  and  in  order  to  make  a  place
              for  the  neo-privileged  texts  of  their  own  ethnic  canon-to-be.  In parallel
              with raising their own ethnic  group  to  be on  the same level as other  ethnic
              groups.  Exactly.
                This fits  in with my thought  that the modem nation state is typically  an
              ethnic  "empire,"  They are  in  effect  fighting the  ethnic hegemony of  one
              ethnic group and  acquiring  a  new lexicon  in  order to  be  able  to  say that
              the  United States  of  America is  a  multi-ethnic  society.  It  is  an  ethnic
              empire,  but  instead  of  being  ruled  by an  ethnic  monarchy,  its  power  base
              is  rooted  in  an  elite  ethnic  oligarchy  that  holds  sway  within  an  ostensibly
              democratic  republic. Right,  An  ethnic oligarchy  of groups,  I  often say that
              'White''  is  the most racist  word in the American  language  because there  is
   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240