Page 239 - Contribution To Phenomenology
P. 239

232        STANFORD     M.  LYMAN & LESTER     EMBREE

              that the disciplines  can be easily merged  and lose their distinctive  characters.
              This  also has not  worked,  often because  one discipline proceeded to  try to
              assimilate the  rest, which makes  me  think  that  integration  is  again the
              ideological  mask for  disciplinary  hegemony  on  the part  of,  say,  history  in
              past  attempts to  build Women's  Studies programs  or biology  in attempts to
              build Environmental Studies programs.  In contrast,  a multi-discipline  would
              respect  the uniqueness  and distinctness  of  the constituent  disciplines,  strive
              for  equality  of all disciplines  within  it, and not gloss over the difficulties  of
              maintaining  mutual respect  and  cooperation.
                Whether  called  a  multi-discipline  or  an  inter-discipline,  Ethnic  Studies
              will  project  itself  according  to  the  problems  posed.  Many  Ethnic  Studies
              departments  are  staffed  by  historians,  sociologists,  anthropologists,
              psychologists,  and  experts  on  literature.  Within  the  framework  of  the
              curriculum,  each  approaches  the  topic  from  his  or  her  disciplinary
              outlook.  Ethnic  Studies  is,  at  present,  organized  along  lines  similar  to
              the  old  "area  studies'*  programs,  e.g.,  "Japan  Studies,''  "Middle-Eastern
              Studies," etc.  No  intellectually distinctive  Ethnic  Studies/7^r$p^crfv^  as  such
              has  yet  emerged.  I  discount  those  chauvinistic  claims  that  are  empty  of
              everything  but  rhetoric  about  a  "Black,"  "Hispanic,"  "Asian  American,"
              or  other  outlooks.
                While we  have focussed on  a  development  of  the  last four  decades in
              the  leading universities  in  the  United States and  the  centuries  of  interna-
              tional  (especially  European)  cultural  events  and  over a  century  of cultural
              scientific  debate  (especially  in  sociology)  that  are behind them, could you
              sketch what you  know about similar  intellectual  responses  elsewhere  in the
              world to  what I  guess  we might call diversities  of  ethnic  groups?  I  suspect
              that Great Britain, for example,  has been moving in the direction,  especially
              since World War II, adding substantial  new racial and  ethnic groups  from
              outside to  the  internal  set  it  has  had for  centuries.  Are  there  academic-
              institutional as well as theoretical developments  that relate  to  this? I  cannot
              speak  about  multidisciplinary  developments  in  most  of  the  world.
              However,  it  is  worth  noting  that  in  countries  that  were  once  part  of  the
              English seaborne empire,  and  are  now part of  the  British  Commonwealth,
              the  term  "British  subject"  modifies  jural  and  civic  identities  of  ethnona-
              tionals.  In  Africa,  a  few  Anglophone  and  Francophone  scholars  are
              struggling  to  define  a  continent-wide  civilizational  culture  that  preceded
              imperiaUsm  and  that  has  survived  both  colonialism  and  separate  na-
              tion-statehood.
   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244