Page 322 - Contribution To Phenomenology
P. 322

BIOGRAPHY    AS  A  CULTURAL   DISCIPLINE          315

              ders  each  moment"^'  And,  it  is  regressive,  or  analytic,  as  it  must  "at  the
              start  proceed  as  far  as  is  possible  for  us  in  the  historical  particularity  of
              the  object."^  As  Sartre  envisions  it,  he  is  "inventing  a  personage"  when
              he  uses  hypotheses  to  construct  a  narrative  that  encompasses  this
              dialectical  movement  and  interrelationship  between  the  individual  and  his
              cultural  context  The  result  is  the  individual  who  is  both  totalizer  and
              totalized.  The  question  to  be  asked  is  who  someone  must  have  been  in
              order  to  have  within  his  field  of  possibilities  the  possibility  of  doing  what
              he  did/i
                Taken  together  the  the  progressive/regressive  aspects  of  the  strategy
              yield  man  as  the  universal  singular  who  is  the  product  of  the  interre-
              lationship  between  the  individual  and  his  culture.  As  Sartre  writes:


                     a  man  is  never  an  individual;  it  would  be  more  fitting  to  call  him  a
                     universal  singular.  Summed  up  and  for  this  reason  universalized  by  his
                     epoch,  he  in  turn  resumes  it  by  reproducing  himself  in  it  as  singularity.
                     Universal  by  the  singular  universality  of  human  history,  singular  by  the
                     universalizing  singularity  of  his  projects.'*^

                Sartre  was  well  aware  that  his  procedures  were  unorthodox  and
              flamboyantly  pronounced  his  last  biography  a  "true  novel,"  thus  declar-
              ing  it  a  curious  hybrid  of  philosophical,  literary,  historical  and  psychoan-
             alytic  techniques.  Concerned  that  the  reception  of  his  project  would  be
              greeted  with  hostility  and  increduhty,  he  nevertheless  believed  that  he
             would be  vindicated  by the  methodologically rigorous  techniques  employed
              in  the  study:

                     This  is  a  fabrication,  I  confess.  I  have  no  proof  that  it  was  so.  And
                     worse  still,  the  absence  of  such  proofs—^which  would  necessarily  be
                     singular  facts—leads  us,  even  when  we  fabricate,  to  schematism,  to
                     generality;  my  story  is  appropriate  to  infants,  not  to  Gustave  in
                     particular.  Never  mind.  I  wanted  to  follow  it  out  for  this  reason  alone:
                     the  real  explanation,  I  can  imagine  without  the  least  vexation,  may  be
                     precisely  the  contrary  of  what  I  invent,  but  in  any  case  it  will  have  to


                  ^  Jean-Paul  Sartre, Search for a Method,  translated  by Hazel  E.  Barnes  (New
              York:  Vintage  Books,  1968),  147.
                  ^  Ibid,,  140.
                  ^1  cf.  Ibid,,  141.
                  ^^  Jean-Paul  Sartre,  The  Family  Idiot Vol.  1,  ix.
   317   318   319   320   321   322   323   324   325   326   327