Page 243 - Physical Principles of Sedimentary Basin Analysis
P. 243

7.11 Lithospheric extension, phase changes and subsidence/uplift  225

            mantle. The change in the average mantle density after instantaneous stretching with a
            factor β is
                                            1        
    1
                                      m =−   m,0 α T a 1 −                    (7.108)
                                            2             β

            and it becomes    m =−32 kg m −3  for β = 2, using the parameters   m,0 = 3300 kg m −3 ,
            α = 3 · 10 −5  kg m −3  and T a = 1300 C. The associated thermal uplift becomes
                                               ◦
             s = 1670 m. (See equation (7.33).) A change in the average mantle density gives much
            more uplift or subsidence than in the crust because the lithospheric mantle is an order of
            magnitude thicker than the crust.
              It turns out that phase changes might take place in the lithospheric mantle when hot
            mantle moves upwards during extension. There is a change in density when a material
            enters a new phase. Phase changes in the mantle are dependent on the composition, and
            we will in the following look at just one possible phase transition – the spinel–peridotite to
            plagioclase–peridotite transformation. Kaus et al. (2005) shows that the spinel–plagioclase
            transformation is the most important one during lithospheric extension because it gives the
            largest density difference.
              The example with thermal uplift shows that a moderate alteration of the average man-
            tle density leads to a sizable vertical movement. The possible additional subsidence/uplift
            from a phase change in the mantle during extension is now studied with a simple model
            based on a study of Simon and Podladchikov (2008). Podladchikov et al. (1994) and
            Yamasaki and Nakada (1997) have presented similar models. Figure 7.19 shows a sim-
            plified phase diagram where the spinel–plagioclase phase transition is represented by a
            straight line. Kaus et al. (2005) and Simon and Podladchikov (2008) discuss phase dia-
            grams with three phases and the associated density changes for different types of mantle


                              5


                              4

                                                   β = 1
                            pressure [GPa]
                              3

                              2
                                                        β = 2
                                                                 3300
                                                                 3280
                                                                 3260
                                                           β = 3  3240
                                            spinel               3220
                              1                            β = 4  3200
                                                           β = 4  3180
                                                                 3160
                                          plagioclase            3140
                                                                 3120
                              0                                  3100
                              200  400   600  800  1000  1200  1400
                                          temperature [C]
            Figure 7.19. A simplified picture of mantle density and the spinel–plagioclase phase transition.
   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248