Page 76 - Physical chemistry understanding our chemical world
P. 76

PHYSICAL AND MOLECULAR INTERACTIONS      43

                       Table 2.1  Values of electronegativity χ for some main-group elements

                      H
                      2.1
                      Li       Be        B        C       N        O        F
                      1.0      1.5      2.0      2.5      3.0      3.5     4.0
                      Na       Mg        Al      Si       P        S        Cl
                      0.9      1.2      1.5      1.8      2.1      2.5     3.0
                      K        Ca       Ga       Ge       As       Se      Br
                      0.8      1.0      1.6      1.8      2.0      2.4     2.8
                      Rb        Sr                                          I
                      0.8      1.0                                         2.5

             χ between H and Cl is greater than the difference between F and Cl. There will be no
             excess charge in the two molecules H–H or Cl–Cl because the atoms in both are the
             same – we say they are homonuclear. Table 2.1 contains a few electronegativities.

             SAQ 2.2 By looking at the electronegativities in Table 2.1, suggest wheth-
             er the bonds in the following molecules will be polar or non-polar: (a) hydro-
             gen bromide, HBr; (b) silicon carbide, SiC; (c) sulphur dioxide, O=S=O; and
             (d) sodium iodide, NaI.

               The actual magnitude of the excess charge is generally unknown,
             although we do know they are small. Whereas some calculations  Water is a neutral
                                                                          molecule, so the cen-
             suggest that δ is perhaps as much as 0.1 of a full, formal charge,
                                                                          tral negative charge
             others suggest about 0.01 or even less.                      in the water molecule
               While debate persists concerning the magnitudes of each excess
                                                                          counteracts the two
             charge within a molecule, it is certain that the overall charge on the  positive charges.
             molecule is zero, meaning that the two positive charges in water
             cancel out the central negative charge on the oxygen. We reason
             this by saying that water is a neutral molecule.             A ‘dipole’ forms when
               Figure 2.3 shows the ‘V’ shape of the water molecule. The top  equal and opposite
             of the molecule (as drawn) has a negative excess charge and the  charges are separated
                                          −
                                   +
             bottom is positive. The δ and δ charges are separated spatially,  by a short distance. ‘Di’
                                                                          means two, and ‘pole’
             which we call a dipole. Such dipoles are crucial when explain-
                                                                          indicates the two ends
             ing why water vapour so readily forms a liquid: those parts of
                                                                          of a magnet.
                                                         +
             the molecule bearing a slight positive charge (δ ) attract those
                                                                    −
             parts of adjacent molecules that bear a slight negative charge (δ ).
             The interaction is electrostatic, and forms in much a similar man-
                                                                          ‘Van der Waals forces’
             ner to the north pole of a magnet attracting the south pole of  are electrostatic inter-
             another magnet.                                              actions between di-
               Electrostatic interactions of this type are called ‘dipole–dipole  poles. (Note how we
             interactions’, or ‘van der Waals forces’ after the Dutch physicist  pronounce ‘Waals’ as
             Johannes Diderik van der Waals (1837–1923) who first postulated  ‘vahls’.)
             their existence. A van der Waals force operates over a relatively
   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81