Page 195 - Pipeline Risk Management Manual Ideas, Techniques, and Resources
P. 195

7/172 Leak Impact Factor
          ronmental sensitivity and high value areas (HVAs). Scores are   researchheaching  hospital.  By  population  density, the class
          determined  based  on  qualitative  descriptions  and  are  to  be   location is 4 (very high). Cleanup costs for leaked natural gas
           added to the population class number. The worst case (highest   are expected to be minimal. If a fire or explosion occurs, dam-
           number) in each column should govern. When conditions from   age could be extensive. Given the unique nature of the struc-
           both columns coexist, both scores can be added to the popula-   tures nearby and the value of the contents within-specialized
           tion class number.                         equipment, research in progress, records, and files-the  evalu-
            The extremes of this consequence  scale will be intuitively   ator feels the surroundings represent a higher value and scores
           obvious-the   most  environmentally  sensitive  area  and  the   the additional consequences for pipeline operations in this area
           highest population class and the highest value areas simultane-   as 0.9 on a 0-to  1.0-point scale. He adds the environmental/
           ously occurring in the same section would be the highest conse-   HVA  score to the population  class to get 4.9 as the receptor
           quence  section.  The  scale  midrange,  however,  might   score.
           discomfort  some people in that a certain amount of environ-   Emergency response to a gas leak would not always be quick
           mental sensitivity (or value ofthe surroundings) is said to equal   enough  to reduce  potential  damages.  No  spill  score  adjust-
           a certain population  increase. In other words, environmental   ments are made.
           loss and economic loss are being equated to loss of life. In Table
           7.22,  the  highest  environmental  sensitivity  and  the  greatest
           HVA can each change the surroundings score by the equivalent   Example 7.8: Extreme consequences
           of one population class designation.
            Assessment schemes such as the one shown in Table 7.22 are   A 24-in. crude oil pipeline traverses a wetlands area and par-
           of course very general and contain value judgments that might   allels a stream for over a mile within the wetlands. This is a
           be  controversial. They can, however,  be useful  screening  or   Class  1  area  (low  population).  Cleanup  of  a  spill  in  this
           high-level tools in a risk assessment. The following examples   freshwater  marsh  would  involve  much  damage  associated
           illustrate  some general  (high-level) consequence  scoring for   with  heavy  equipment  and  long-term  remediation  activities
           various receptors, based onTable 7.22.     (temporary roads,  establishment  of pumping  stations,  etc.).
                                                      Immediately adjacent  to the  wetlands area, and within  one-
           Example 7.5: Neutral consequences          quarter mile of the pipeline, a small community removes water
                                                      from the stream to supplement its groundwater intakes. Noting
            A natural gas pipeline traverses an agricultural area ofclass 1   the immediate wetlands threat from any spill, the high cost of
           and Class 2 (low and medium) population densities. Soil condi-   remediation, and the threat to a community water supply, the
           tions are organic clay and sand. Nearby housing and commercial   evaluator scores the conditions as 0.8 on a 0-to 1 .O-point scale.
           buildings are consistent with most comparable class locations.   If the water intake was the community’s only water supply and
           There is no known endangered species that could be impacted   if endangered species were involved, the evaluator would have
           by a leak in this area. A leak of natural gas is lighter than air and   scored the situation as 0.85 or 0.9. The receptor score is then 1 +
           would have minimal chronic impact as shown by  its product   0.8 = 1.8.
           hazard score (chronic component) of 2. No environmental or   The operator has a very strong environmental program that
           high-value receptors are vulnerable from these sections.   includes a detailed, well-practiced response plan.  Cornpany-
                                                      owned equipment and contract equipment are on standby and
                                                      can be quickly placed in this area through the use ofa helicopter
           Example 7.6: Higher consequences           that is also on 24-hour-per-day standby. Trained, equipped per-
                                                      sonnel can be at this site within 1 hour. A manned control room
            Outside  a  major  metropolitan area,  a  subdivision of  very   should be able to detect a significant leak here within a very few
           expensive mansions has recently been constructed within  1800   minutes. The evaluator judges that this level of response can
           feet of a 6-in., 400-psig fuel oil line. The class location is 2. The   indeed  reduce  spill  consequences  by  50%  (threshold  estab-
           pipeline is located on a slope above the new houses. The soil is   lished for modeling purposes) and, hence, he adjusts the spill
           sandy. Groundwater contamination is a possibility, but there are   score, effectively reducing the assumed quantity spilled.
           no intake locations for community water supplies nearby. Spill
           remediation would be higher than normal due to the slope effects,
           the highly permeable soil, and the anticipatedproblems with long-   Hazard zones
           term remediation equipment operating near the residential area.
           The housing is judged to be far enough from the pipeline and the   Hazard  zones  are  defined  to  be  distances  from  a  pipeline
           thermal effects from burning fuel oil are limited enough that the   release point  at which  significant  damages could occur to a
           immediate impact to that community is a remote possibility. The   receptor (see also Chapter 14). Therefore, a hazard zone is usu-
           evaluator scores this situation  0.5 on a 0-to 1 .O-point scale, in con-   ally a function of how far potential thermal and overpressure
           sideration of the topography and the high house values. He adds   effects may extend from the release point. Note that when haz-
           this to the population class to get 2.5 as the receptor score.   ard zone is calculated as a distance from a source such as a
                                                      burning liquid pool or vapor cloud centroid that source might
                                                      not be at the pipeline failure location. In fact, the source can be
           Example 7.7: Extreme consequences          some distance from the leak site. Relative hazard zones for a
                                                      vapor release are illustrated in Figure 7.8. A hazard zone might
            A high-pressure, 30-in. natural gas pipeline is in a corridor   also include potential liquid contamination distances for vul-
           that  runs  within  300 ft  of  a  major  university  including  a   nerable receptors such as water intakes and sensitive environ-
   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200