Page 263 - Pipelines and Risers
P. 263

236                                                               Chapter 14

          Folias Factor M
          The Folias factor M is a geometric factor developed by Folias (1964) to account for the stress
          concentration effect  of  a  notch  in  the  pipes.  Recent  studies  (Kiefner  and  Vieth  (1989))
          recommended the following expression to improve the accuracy of the Folias factor:
                   /=   2.51(L/2)2  0.054(L/2)4  for clso


                             L2              L2 Dt                           (14.17)
                                                >
                         0.032-   +3.3     for - 50
                             Dt               Dt
          14.2.6  Problems excluded in the B31G Criteria
          The ASME B31G criterion can not be applied in some practical corrosion problems including
          corroded welds, ductile and low toughness pipe, and corroded pipes under combined pressure,
          axial and bending loads. Recent studies concluded that the corrosion in submerged-arc seams
          (longitudinal welds) should be handled in the same manner as corrosion in the body of  the
          pipe. Corrosion in Electric Resistance Welds (ERW) or flash-welded seams should not  be
          evaluated on the basis of  the existing B31G criteria. It is recommended that Kastner's local
          collapse criteria (Kastner et al. (1981) is to be used to evaluate corrosion in (circumferential)
          girth welds.


          A  fracture mechanics approach (PD 6493) should be applied for assessing corroded welds,
          considering possible  defects in  the  welds.  The effect  of  material's  fracture  toughness  (in
          ductile and low toughness pipe) is reflected by the critical fracture toughness of the material
          used in the fracture assessment criteria.

          In the B31G criteria, the effect of  axial load is not discussed. In general, tensile longitudinal
          stress may  delay yielding and pipe bursting.  On the  other hand,  compressive longitudinal
          stress may accelerate yielding and result in reductions in bursting pressure. Figure 14.5 shows
          the effect of axial load on collapse pressure (Galambos, 1988).
















          Figure 14.5 Effect of Axial had on the Collapse Pressure.
          Figure 14.5 shows that:


          0  The internal burst pressure is largely reduced by axial compression
   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268