Page 319 - Pipelines and Risers
P. 319

cost of deferred production.


          The expected (average) number of  loss of  containment incidents, associated fatalities and
          environmental damage can  be  used  to  derive an  expected cost  incorporating each  of  the
          quantities given above. A detailed methodology by which to evaluate financial risk has been
           developed in the paper by  Bai et al. (1999) and can also be used to minimize these potential
          costs to the owner of the pipeline


           16.8  Example 1: Risk analysis for a Subsea Gas Pipeline


           16.8.1  General
           This risk analysis example will evaluate the risk acceptance and risk estimation of a North Sea
           pipeline transporting dry gas.


           This example will  cover all aspects of  the risk methodology developed in  the chapter. By
           firstly determining the gas release for different hole sizes it is then possible to determine the
           potential effects on each type of risk.
           16.8.2  Gas Releases
           In  order to provide an analysis that can be considered representative for the entire pipeline,
           the release rates have been estimated (conservatively) on the assumption that the water depth
           is 300m. This leads to a differential pressure at the site of loss of containment of = 250 bar.


           Representative Hole Sizes
           Potential hole sizes will  be modeled through  the use of  three representative hole sizes with
           diameters of  20mm, SOmm, and 200mm. The 20mm and 8Omm hole sizes have been selected
           to provide ease of comparison with the hole sizes considered in the PARLOC database. The
           largest hole size considered is 200mm. This is considered to be a conservative upper bound to
           the equivalent hole size caused by major structural damage to the pipeline.


           Discharge
           Release rates  have  been  estimated using  SPILL. This  is  part  of  the  HGSystem  suite  of
           programmer. The rates predicted for these hole sizes are given below. Indicative duration’s
           for these releases are also shown below. These durations are based on the time required to
           blow down the pipeline through the hole and it is assumed that the mass release rates decrease
           linearly with time.

                    20mm hole      14.6 kg/sec   6000 hours
                    8Omm hole     233.2 kg/sec   375 hours
                   200mm hole    1457.1 kg/sec    60 hours
   314   315   316   317   318   319   320   321   322   323   324