Page 40 - Pipelines and Risers
P. 40

14                                                                Chapter I


              To provide additional resistance to forces by use of  anchors (rock-berms) or additional
              weights on the pipeline.

           In the latter case the spacing of  the anchors must be designed to eliminate the potential for
           sections of  line between the Axed points to undergo large movements or suffer high stress
           levels. The safety of the line on the seabed is again the most important criterion in the stability
           design.

           A finite element model for on-bottom stability analysis is discussed in Chapter 8.

           1.4.5  Expansion Analysis
           The expansion analysis determines the maximum pipeline expansion at the two temrination
           points and the maximum associated axial load in the pipeline. Both  results have significant
           implications in the design as:

              Axial load will  determine if  the line may buckle during operation, and hence additional
              analysishestraint will be required;
              End  expansions dictate the  expansion  that  the  tie-in  spools (or  other)  would  have  to
              accommodate.

           The degree of the expansion by  the pipeline is a function of  the operational parameters and
           the restraint on the pipeline. The line will expand up to the “anchor point”, and past this point
           the line does not expand (hence fully restrained). The distance between the pipeline end and
           this length is determined based on the operational parameters and the pipeline restraints. The
            less the restraint the greater the anchor length becomes and hence the greater tie-in expansion
           becomes (see Figure 1.5 for terminology).

            1.4.6  Buckling Analysis
           Buckling of a line occurs when the effective force within the line becomes so great that the
            line has to deflect, and so reduce these axial loads (i.e. takes a lower energy state).


            As more pipelines operate at  higher temperatures  (over  100°C) the likelihood of  buckling
            becomes more pertinent.


           The buckliog analysis will be performed to identify whether buckling is likely to occur (see
           Figure  1.6).  If  it  is,  then  further  analysis  iS  performed  to  either  prevent  buckling  or
            accommodate it.

            A method of preventing buckling is to rock dump the pipeline. This induces even higher loads
            in the line but prevents it buckling. However, if  the rock dump should not provide enough
            restraint then localized buckling may occur (i.e. upheaval buckling) which can cause failure of
            the line.
   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45