Page 450 - Pipelines and Risers
P. 450

Fatigue of Risers                                                     417


        Deepwater risers are usually so long that significant currents will excite a natural bending
        mode  that  is  much  higher  than  the fundamental bending  mode.  Since deepwater currents
        usually change in magnitude (and direction) with depth, it is therefore possible that multiple
        modes of the riser can be excited into VIV. This makes deepwater riser VIV prediction much
        more complex than that for short riser spans typical of fixed platforms in shallow water.


        The VIV  response  of  deepwater risers  is further complicated by  the  presence of  adjacent
        tubulars such as risers and tendons. When all, or part, of a riser is in the wake of  an upstream
        tubular, the VIV of the riser can be substantially altered and often worsened. Furthermore, the
        presence of adjacent tubulars can cause changes in the drag forces acting on a riser, resulting
        in the possibility of damaging collisions between tubulars.


        Analysis Methods
        VIV may be generated by  waves or currents and may occur either in-line or normal  to the
        direction of current flow. The most severe form of VIV, in terms of  riser fatigue damage, is
        cross-flow vibration due to steady current.
        The  analytical  methods  used  for  calculation  of  VIV  response  are  based  on  empirical
        observations. Until recently, much of the guidance on VIV behavior only considered lock-on
        vibration in  uniform flow. This can  give conservative predictions of  fatigue damage. The
        methods  must  therefore  consider  the  sheared  flow  regime  along  the  riser  length  and
        interaction of vibration modes excited at different points along the riser.


        Modeling Approach
        Definition of current velocity profile is an important factor. The current velocity component
        normal to the riser must be calculated which  is dependent on  the angle variation along the
        riser and the incident angle of the current.
        TDP at the seabed may be modeled using a pinned end restraint. Consideration should also be
        given to the damping effect of the seabed.


        Analytical Approach
        Analyses are first conducted assuming no suppression devices are attached to the riser. The
        fatigue damage incurred from VrV  of  each  profile analyzed is then  factored accordion the
        frequency of Occurrence of the profile is calculated and the total fatigue damage due to VIV is
        then given by the sum of the factored damage for each profile. Final analyses are conducted
        using the specified arrangement, which incorporates VIV suppression devices as required to
        achieve the  desired  fatigue  life.  As  directionality of  current  and  riser  orientation is  not
        specified, analyses are conducted for currents flowing in the plane of  the riser and normal to
        the  riser. For  application of  the  currents in  the  plane  of  the riser,  the  velocity  profile  is
        resolved normal to the nominal riser position.
        22.2.4  Other Fatigue Causes

        The following causes should be considered for fatigue evaluation as appropriate.

        -  Shutdown and start-up
   445   446   447   448   449   450   451   452   453   454   455