Page 454 - Pipelines and Risers
P. 454

Fatigue of Risers                                                     421


           Calculating
        -  Support forces
        -  Pipe wall forces
        -   Velocities and accelerations from wave and vessel motion time series

        -  Statistical time series analysis, estimation of spectral densities


        22.5  Vortex-induced Vibration Prediction
        Accurate  estimation  of  the  fatigue  life  of  a  deepwater  riser  experiencing vortex-induced
        vibration  depends  critically  upon  accurate  estimation  of  the  response  amplitude  and
        frequencies (or mode numbers). Accurate estimations of  the response amplitude and mode
        number are, in turn, dependent upon several “basic” parameters that include:

        -   The current profile (both magnitude and shape variation with depth)
        -  The frequency and magnitude of the lift force imparted to the riser by the vortex shedding
        -   The excitation and correlation lengths of the lift forces and vortex shedding
        -  The hydrodynamic damping
        -  The structural properties of the riser including damping, mass, tension, bending stiffness,
           and the cross sectional geometry (including surface roughness)


        VIV is perhaps more sensitive to the current profile than  to any other parameter. For short
        riser spans the current magnitude determines whether or not VIV will occur, and determines
        whether the response is in-line or transverse to the flow direction (or both). The cross-flow
        response is more significant than the inline response, see Figure 22.3. For deepwater risers, a
        very  low  current  will,  at  least  theoretically, produce  some  VIV  due  to  the  low  natural
        frequency of  the riser in bending. The variation of  the current along the riser span (i.e. with
        depth) then determines which modes will be present in the response. Here it should be noted
        that:


           Current profiles that are conservative for platform offsets are not necessarily conservative
           for deepwater riser VIV prediction (this is because VIV of  deepwater risers is much more
           dependent upon the shape of the current profile with depth)
           The current profile should be varied during the analysis to determine the sensitivity of the
           results to current profile shape
           Currents  change  with  time,  so  some kind  of  probabilistic description of  the  current
           magnitudes and/or profile shapes is necessary for a sufficiently accurate VIV analysis
           It  is  possible that  even  if  numerous modes  are potentially exited  by  a current profile
           (typical of deepwater riser in a significant current), a single mode (or a small number of
           modes) can dominate the response due to “lock-in” in which the vortex shedding tends to
           adjust to the vibration  frequency within certain limits (dependent upon  mass ratio and
           Reynolds number among other things)
           Even in a highly sheared current it is possible for a single mode (or a small number of
           modes) to dominate the response
   449   450   451   452   453   454   455   456   457   458   459