Page 151 - Plant-Based Remediation Processes
P. 151

142                                                   T. Vamerali et al.

            spp.) (Laureysens et al. 2004a, b) and willow (Salix spp.) (Rosselli et al. 2003;
            Dickinson and Pulford 2005) may provide an efficient and cost-effective decon-
            tamination method. Herbaceous species produce a denser vegetation cover which is
            effective against erosion and may create an aerobic environment in the rhizosphere,
            increasing soil aggregation and binding contaminants through the release of organic
            matter (Pulford and Watson 2003; Robinson et al. 2006). Roots can also efficiently
            act in phytostabilisation by sequestering metals, especially those with limited
            mobility such as Pb and Cu (Marmiroli et al. 2005; Yoon et al. 2006) and favouring
            precipitation with root exudates (Heim et al. 1999; Yang et al. 2005). Various
            means have been successfully tested in the last 10 years to improve phytoextraction
            efficiency in biomass species, but mainly in agricultural or forest soils. Assisted
            phytoextraction with low toxic organic chelators, like NTA (nitrilotriacetic acid)
            and EDDS (ethylene-diamine-disuccinic acid), positively increase metal uptake in
            Ethiopian mustard (Brassica carinata A. Braun) (Quartacci et al. 2007). Exogenous
            applications of growth regulators may also result in higher growth and metal uptake
            in alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) and sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) (Lopez et al.
            2005; Liphadzi et al. 2006), whereas mycorrhization facilitates metal acquisition in
            maize (Zae mays L.) (Shen et al. 2006; Wang et al. 2007). However, investigations
            are often conducted in the laboratory or in microcosms, thus making transferral of
            results to the open field ineffective. Only few experiments have been carried out
            in situ and limited information is available on particular substrates, such as
            sediments and industrial wastes. In this framework, a summary of results on the
            phytoremediation of pluri-metal-contaminated pyrite cinders is presented here,
            focusing on plant responses to several agronomic practices at pot and field level.
            As a single green technology may fail in this context, the traditional concept of
            phytoremediation should be reviewed in the light of a multidisciplinary approach.



            8.2  What the Literature States on Phytoremediation of Pyrite


            Among metal-polluted media, great concern focuses on industrial waste or
            sediments, the unusual composition of which may further limit plant establishment
            and growth. Among these, we considered pyrite waste, which remains after sulphur

            extraction from pyrite ore roasting at extremely high temperatures (~800 C). The
            waste presents itself as red cinders, mainly composed of fine particles of pyrite
            (FeS 2 ) and other minerals and devoid of organic matter (Vidal et al. 1999). Oxida-
            tion of metal sulphides from pyrite residues can release soluble metals and increase
            soil acidity (Clemente et al. 2006), with consequent hazardous metal movements.
            Phytomanagement of pyrite waste is an interesting and inexpensive option to
            reduce wind erosion and metal leaching, but little information is available in the
            literature on this issue, particularly at field scale. In recent years, some authors have
            found that cultivation of soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.), sorghum (Sorghum
            bicolor L.), maize and sunflower is possible at various rates of pyrite dilution, but
            only at pot level (Fellet et al. 2007). In the open field, the establishment and
   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156