Page 193 - Plant-Based Remediation Processes
P. 193

10  Phytostabilization as Soil Remediation Strategy             185

            10.3  Remediation Strategies


            Remediation is essential to mitigate the negative effects caused by the heavy metals
            incorporated to ecosystems, alone or in mixtures. The overall objective of any soil
            remediation approach is to create a final solution that protects human health and the
            environment. Natural remediation of heavy metal-contaminated soils can be
            improved by immobilization techniques.





            10.3.1 Immobilization Techniques

            Ex situ and in situ immobilization techniques are practical approaches to remedia-
            tion of metal-contaminated soils.
              The ex situ technique is useful in areas where a large amount of contaminated
            soil must be removed from its place of origin, and its storage is connected with a
            high ecological risk. The main advantage of ex situ techniques is the fast and
            easy applicability. However, the disadvantages include (1) high invasivity to the
            environment, (2) generation of a significant amount of solid wastes (twice as large
            as volume after processing), (3) the by-product must be stored on a special landfill
            site, (4) in the case of changing of the physicochemical condition in the side product
            or its surroundings, there is serious danger of the release of additional contaminants
            to the environment, and (5) permanent control of the stored wastes is required. Soil
            remediation by conventional physicochemical technologies could be expensive;
            there is an interest in alternative remediation strategies.
              In in situ technique, the fixing agent’s amendments are applied on the
            unexcavated soil. The technique’s advantages are (1) low invasivity, (2) simplicity
            and rapidity, (3) relatively inexpensive, (4) small amount of wastes are produced,
            (5) high public acceptability, and (6) envelop a wide spectrum of inorganic
            pollutants. The disadvantages of in situ immobilization are as follows (1) is only
            a temporary solution (contaminants are still in the environment), (2) the activation
            of pollutants may occur when soil physicochemical properties change, (3) the
            reclamation process is applied only to the surface layer of soil (30–50 cm), and
            (4) permanent monitoring is necessary (USEPA 1995; Martin and Ruby 2004). In
            situ immobilization technology often uses organic and inorganic amendment to
            accelerate the attenuation of metal mobility and toxicity (Mench et al. 2006).
            Specially, stabilization of contaminated soil by amendments or phytostabilization
            is a remediation technique that reduces the mobile fraction of heavy metals, which
            could contaminate groundwater or be taken up by soil organisms (Mench et al.
            2000). In this respect, it is important remark that the study of solubility and
            bioavailability might be more important in remediation activities than the study
            of total or pseudo-total concentrations of these elements in contaminated soils,
            because they represent the most labile fractions subject to leaching and to being
            uptaken by plants and microorganisms (Adriano 2004).
   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198