Page 476 - Polymer-based Nanocomposites for Energy and Environmental Applications
P. 476

Nanocomposite membrane for environmental remediation              429

           magnitude of the interactions between the membrane and the substances to be
           processed. Best example is the effect of surface electrochemical properties on the
           adsorption of proteins [175]. Nowadays, ceramic technology is used to generate inor-
           ganic membranes having a more complex pore structure. Furthermore, some ceramic
           membranes are formed using a combination of oxides and the resulting membranes
           called mixed oxide ceramic membranes (Rappore). Their surface electrochemical
           properties have been analyzed as a result of computerized measurements of rates
           of electroosmosis as a function of pH (reported as zeta 0 potentials) and computerized
           pH surface titration. The membranes have different values of zeta potential and high
           titratable surface charge. The membranes have a negative zeta potential above the
           entire pH range 10–3 for an inorganic oxide material. Both the zeta potential-pH
           and surface charge-pH profiles at two ionic strengths might be effectively modeled
           by considering the surface of the membrane composed of a three-dimensional array
           (“gel”) of charged groups, both protons and counter ions being able to penetrate the
           “gel” layer. Especially, at the lower pH values, counter ion penetration was found to
           be significant, where the surface charge of the membrane was positive but the zeta
           potential was negative. To the surface chemistry, such a model permits estimation
           of the “gel” thickness and the relative contribution of the component oxides. Based
           on the bulk composition, it was found that aluminum oxide groups played the supreme
           role in determining surface-related properties although zirconium dioxide was defi-
           nitely the largest component of the membrane. Results demonstrated that the surface
           electrochemistry of such membranes is complex and that in characterizing such
           membranes, it is important to create measurements directly on the membrane rather
           than on the component oxides [176].
              Ceramic membranes have drawn much interest in many industrial applications
           [177] and offer many potential advantages over commercial organic membranes
           because of stability at high temperatures and pressure resistance and stability toward
           chemicals and exhibit high strength, high mechanical resistance, long life, and excel-
           lent defouling properties.
              Among various ceramic oxide membranes, alumina membranes have been exten-
           sively used worldwide. Many other porous membrane materials including ZrO 2 ,
           titania, and SiO 2 were also most studied membranes. For inorganic membranes,
           among all these, ZrO 2 is the most promising and effective material.
              ZrO 2 membranes exhibit high chemical resistance that allows steam sterilization
           and cleaning procedures in the pH range 0–14 [177], decent pure water permeability
           and high membrane flux in separation and filtration [178,179], and high thermal
           stability [178], which is very attractive for catalytic membrane reactors at high
           temperature.
              In the early 1970s, the first profitable ZrO 2 membrane prepared of a layer of
           nonsintered ZrO 2 deposited on a porous carbon was the Ucarsep1 membrane (4 nm).
              Many porous ZrO 2 membranes are formerly developed by several companies
           worldwide; most of them are ultrafiltration membranes prepared mainly using sol-
           gel method. Although on the preparation and characterization of ZrO 2 or YSZ ultra-
           filtration membranes, several studies have been reported [178], but few efforts have
           been made directly to the synthesis of ZrO 2 microfiltration membranes. In comparison
   471   472   473   474   475   476   477   478   479   480   481