Page 480 - Polymer-based Nanocomposites for Energy and Environmental Applications

Nanocomposite membrane for environmental remediation 433

[38] Testino A, Bellobono IR, Buscaglia V, Canevali C, D’Arienzo M, Polizzi S, et al. Opti-
mizing the photocatalytic properties of hydrothermal TiO 2 by the control of phase com-
position and particle morphology. A systematic approach. J Am Chem Soc 2007;
129:3564–75.
[39] Mo S-D, Ching W. Electronic and optical properties of three phases of titanium dioxide:
rutile, anatase, and brookite. Phys Rev B 1995;51(19):13023.
[40] Iskandar F, Nandiyanto ABD, Yun KM, Hogan CJ, Okuyama K, Biswas P. Enhanced
photocatalytic performance of brookite TiO 2 macroporous particles prepared by spray
drying with colloidal templating. Adv Mater 2007;19(10):1408–12.
[41] Bavykin DV, Friedrich JM, Walsh FC. Protonated titanates and TiO 2 nanostructured
materials: synthesis, properties, and applications. Adv Mater 2006;18(21):2807–24.
[42] Morgan BJ, Watson GW. Intrinsic n-type defect formation in TiO 2 : a comparison of rutile
and anatase from GGA+ U calculations. J Phys Chem C 2010;114(5):2321–8.
[43] Qamar M, Yoon C, Oh H, Lee N, Park K, Kim D, et al. Preparation and photocatalytic
activity of nanotubes obtained from titanium dioxide. Catal Today 2008;131(1):3–14.
[44] Kansal S, Singh M, Sud D. Studies on photodegradation of two commercial dyes in
aqueous phase using different photocatalysts. J Hazard Mater 2007;141(3):581–90.
[45] Kim J, Lee CW, Choi W. Platinized WO 3 as an environmental photocatalyst that generates
OH radicals under visible light. Environ Sci Technol 2010;44(17):6849–54.
[46] Li Y, Xie W, Hu X, Shen G, Zhou X, Xiang Y, et al. Comparison of dye photodegradation
and its coupling with light-to-electricity conversion over TiO 2 and ZnO. Langmuir 2009;
26(1):591–7.
[47] Thiruvenkatachari R, Vigneswaran S, Moon IS. A review on UV/TiO 2 photocatalytic
oxidation process (journal review). Korean J Chem Eng 2008;25(1):64–72.
[48] Sung-Suh HM, Choi JR, Hah HJ, Koo SM, Bae YC. Comparison of ag deposition
effects on the photocatalytic activity of nanoparticulate TiO 2 under visible and UV light
irradiation. J Photochem Photobiol A Chem 2004;163(1):37–44.
[49] Stone VF, Davis RJ. Synthesis, characterization, and photocatalytic activity of titania and
niobia mesoporous molecular sieves. Chem Mater 1998;10(5):1468–74.
[50] Lu F, Cai W, Zhang Y. ZnO hierarchical micro/nanoarchitectures: solvothermal synthesis
and structurally enhanced photocatalytic performance. Adv Funct Mater 2008;18(7):
1047–56.
[51] Gupta V. Application of low-cost adsorbents for dye removal—a review. J Environ Manag
2009;90(8):2313–42.
[52] Singh P, Mondal K, Sharma A. Reusable electrospun mesoporous ZnO nanofiber mats
for photocatalytic degradation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon dyes in wastewater.
J Colloid Interface Sci 2013;394:208–15.
[53] Rizzo L, Meric S, Guida M, Kassinos D, Belgiorno V. Heterogenous photocatalytic
degradation kinetics and detoxification of an urban wastewater treatment plant effluent
contaminated with pharmaceuticals. Water Res 2009;43(16):4070–8.
[54] Ibhadon AO, Fitzpatrick P. Heterogeneous photocatalysis: recent advances and applica-
tions. Catalysts 2013;3(1):189–218.
[55] Hao OJ, Kim H, Chiang P-C. Decolorization of wastewater. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol
2000;30(4):449–505.
[56] Chen G. Electrochemical technologies in wastewater treatment. Sep Purif Technol
2004;38(1):11–41.
[57] Li B, Liu T, Wang Y, Wang Z. ZnO/graphene-oxide nanocomposite with remarkably
enhanced visible-light-driven photocatalytic performance. J Colloid Interface Sci 2012;
377(1):114–21.