Page 69 - Practical Control Engineering a Guide for Engineers, Managers, and Practitioners
P. 69
44 Chapter Three
The simple model equation now has the form that we will use
when we get to state space formulations where Y and U will be
vectors and a and b will be matrices. We know intuitively that, in
the face of steps in U, the response of Y will be bounded or that Y
will behave stably. Equation (3-14) suggests that as long as a is
negative (which it has to be for our simple example), stability will
result. The reader should quickly convince himself that when a is
positive (physically unrealistic for this model), the response of Y
will be unbounded or unstable.
Question 3-1 Do you understand the comments about "instability"?
Answer Look at Eq. (3-11) with a replacing -1/r.
We know that, by definition, a is negative but if it were not, note that Y would
increase without bound in the face of a positive value of u.., that is, there would
be instability. For this simple case of a first-order model there is no question
about the sign of a but later on when the models get more sophisticated this
will not always be the case and the "sign" of whatever replaces a will give us
insight into stability.
This temporarily concludes our development of the simple first-
order model where we have really beaten a couple of elementary
equations to death. As things get more complicated we will repeat-
edly come back to this model.
3-2-3 The First-Order Model and Proportional Control
Although optional, it would be quite helpful if the reader is able to
follow the math in App. E used to arrive at the solution of the dif-
ferential equation for the first-order model. We will now take a little
side trip and see what can be learned from this model from the con-
trol point of view.
Let's tack a simple "proportional" controller onto our model
and see if we can control the process output to a desired set point.
Our starting point is the first-order model for the process to be
controlled
dY
r-+Y=gU (3-15)
dt
Our goal is to try to keep the process output Y "acceptably near"
the set pointS by adjusting U in some fashion. The simplest "fashion"
is to form an error
e=S-Y (3-16)