Page 171 - Practical Design Ships and Floating Structures
P. 171

146


            high percentage of the residuary resistance (50-80%).  This percentage increases with Fn. Anyway the
            average percentage of the residuary resistance is about 25% of the total.
            The interference phenomenon was also investigated for the optimised trimaran configuration. For this
            purpose the wave pattern and the residuary non interference resistance coefficients were determined by
            the expressions:




            Were the suffix, codes T, M, 0 refer to trimaran, main hull and outrigger respectively.
            The  differences ACWP(T) = C wpq) - C* WP(T)   and  ACR(T) = C R(T)  - C*R(T) between  the resistance
            coefficients of trimaran  configuration  and corresponding non  interference  resistance  coefficients  are
            due to interference phenomenon. Figure 5  shows  the  percentages   ACWP(T) /C*wp(~) and
            ACR(T)/C*R(T) versus Fn. From the obtained results it can be seen that in the optimised configuration of
            the examined trimaran, the wave making interaction between the main hull and the outriggers reduces
            the wave resistance in the Fn range 0.70-1.00. The most beneficial interference results for Fn - 0.90,
            and this value could be a reference in the design procedure of an operating trimaran.


            3  SEAKEEPING TESTS

            The seakeeping tests have been carried out in the basin of the University of Trieste ( 50.00 m x 3.10 m
            x 1.50 m). The experiments were carried out in head regular waves generated by a plunger wave maker.
            Because of the small tank a light weight carriage was used and its acceleration and deceleration were
            controlled by  a specific software. Heave, pitch and added resistance  have been measured; the added
            resistance was calculated subtracting the resistance measured in calm water.
                  2.5  I                           2.5  -,


                                 Trimaran

                      i
                    1;
                                                  0.5 1
                                       -              ,
                    0  t   ----                     0  I-.   ,  ~   ,   .  .   ~
                        ~
                                                                       7- 7
                     0.4   0.8   1.2   1.6    2      0.4   0.8   1.2   1.6    2
              Figure 6: Heave response amplitude operators. Cross: Fn=0.45; triangle: Fn=0.63, circle: Fn=0.82
                      2.5  ,                     2.5
                          l e                       le
                        2/                        2{G








                         0.4   0.8   1.2   1.6   2   0.4   0.8   1.2   1.6   2
              Figure 7: Pitch response amplitude operators. Cross:Fn=0.45; triangle: Fn=0.63, circle: Fn=0.82
   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176