Page 258 - Practical Design Ships and Floating Structures
P. 258

233




                              Sm = J2sF (om
        where                 C,,,, : wave amplitude
                              om : wave circular frequency
                              s,,, : random phase angle
                              Ao : interval between wave circular frequencies
        The wave exciting forces on the irregular waves are derived from Eqn. (14).





        The deck wetness is defined when a bottom point of VLFS is below free surface and slamming when
        free surface is below a bottom point of VLFS in Eqn. (24) and (25).

                          2, (t) = z(t) - sft) > fieebord
                          2, (t) = z(t) - g(t) < -draft
                            where,  Z, : the local relative vertical motion

        In  the  frequency domain, the response amplitude operator(R40)  of relative vertical responses  in
        regular waves can be expressed as follows.





        The relative responses for incident waves is described by the Rayleigh density function, the following
        relations in the  frequency and  time  domain  are satisfied for the probability of  deck  wetness  and
        slamming.

                            P~ =exp[-f2  /2rn,l
                            P,!  = exp[-dz l2m, ]
         where,             f: freebord of VLFS
                            d : drafi of VLFS


        4  NUMERICAL RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
        Fig.1  shows the VLFS model of length 1,20Om, breadth 24Om,  depth 4Sm, draft l.Om,  and rigidity
        4.559x1O9kgfrn. The water depth is 20m. The location of slamming and deck wetness is expressed by
        circle in Fig. 1. VLFS is subdivided into 60x8 flat shell elements.
        Fig.3  shows a wave spectrum used  in the prediction.  Its  significant wave height is 4.81m,  wave
        period is 1 Ssec, and incident wave angle is 180 degree.
        Fig. 4 shows the comparison of hydroelastic vertical displacements in the frequency domain analysis
        with  those in the time domain analysis. The wave period  is 8  seconds and  its height is 2m.  The
        responses predicted by two methods show good agreements and the time domain analysis method is
        validated.
   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263