Page 432 - Practical Design Ships and Floating Structures
P. 432

407


















                                Figure 4: The L / G template

      The  WG template  provides  a  method  for  simulation  of  welding  in large  assemblies.  The  template
      makes it possible to represent properly the accumulated distortions and the boundary conditions of the
      local solid models. The employment of local solid models offers further a detailed  simulation of the
      welding response as the local models include dynamic activation of fillet elements, dynamic coupling
      of parts, the modelling of contact between parts and account for the positioning  of tack welds. There
      are, however, also drawbacks related to the WG template. First, it is presupposed  that the welds are
      cooled  to  ambient  temperature  before  the  next  weld  is  initiated.  Secondly,  the  stresses  cannot  be
      represented in the weld line regions by the global model since the shell elements representing the local
      models  have  been  made  stress-free  in the  procedure  used  for  displacement  updating.  Thirdly,  and
      possibly most  important,  the  modelling complexity  of the  implementation of the template  is rather
      large. The use of dedicated subroutines facilitates, however, the application of the template and makes
      it relatively easy to modify e.g. the welding sequence. These disadvantages are, however, insignificant
      in comparison with the capability offered by the template, especially as there is no alternative available
      for welding simulation in large assemblies.


     To illustrate the capability of the template  the effect of welding  sequence on the final displacement
      field is considered. The L/G template has been applied to the arbitrary welding  sequences shown in
      Figure  5. The  effect  of welding  sequence  is  illustrated  in  Figure  6  by  comparison  of the  final  y-
      displacements which results  from weld  sequence  1 with those resulting  from weld  sequence 2. The
     differences  observed  are not  only  related  to the  magnitude  but  also to the  qualitative  deformation
     pattern and it may be concluded that weld sequence 2 results in less deformation.

















                      (a) Sequence 1.                (b) Sequence 2.

                           Figure 5 : Welding sequences investigated.
   427   428   429   430   431   432   433   434   435   436   437