Page 535 - Practical Design Ships and Floating Structures
P. 535

510

              different blockage  correction caused  by  ships moving  in  a towing tank and  in  an operathg  area
              considered. A large number of theoretical and experimental investigations has been devoted to this
              problem. As documented by Gross and Watanabe (1972), there are two methods for Comting these
              boundary effects. One is to correct the resistance and the other  to correct the speed. These two methods
              are combined in the so-called Schlichting’s hypothesis (1934).  According to his hypothesis the wave
              resistance is the same at the same wave length corresponding to different speeds in deep and shallow
              water and the viscous resistance is the same at the same speed relative to the water at different water-
              depths. The speed change due to the blockage effect can be empirically estimated either by  using the
              simple control parameter defined by Schlichting (1 934) Without correcting the wall effects or by using
              a control parameter based on the hydraulic radius given by Landweber (1 939), which is also applicable
              for a real shape of the channel section. The speed change at each parameter value can be either read in
              the  Corresponding  diagrams or  calculated  from  the  empirical  formulae,  e.g.  Lackenby (1963).  For
               nmow channels, like many small towing tanks, the mean flow theory based on the one-dimensional
              continuity and Bernoulli’s  equation has been widely used. These tow equations lead to a mean flow
               over the whole channel section. The mean flow change near the ship’s surface can then be obtained by
               means of an empirical factor, e.g. Emerson (1 959) using a constant value independent of the speed and
               Kim (1 963) using a factor depending on speed and block coefficient.
               The present study focuses on a physically reasonable and practically applicable method for resistance
               and  propulsion prediction of  ships in  shallow  water  at  a  subcritical speed.  After  analyzing  the
               resistance characteristics at different water-depths, a new method is proposed for predicting the total
               resistance which can be  considered  as a unit  function  of the  effective speed defined  by  the mean
               sinkage.  Accordingly,  the  propulsion  tests  will  be  conducted  at  a  ship  self-propulsion point
               corresponding to the effective speed. It can be shown that the delivered power at propeller seams to be
               a unit function of the blockage speed. In comparison to the earlier empirical approximation, the new
               method includes one additional information, namely the mean sinkage, which is an individual quantity
               depending both on the ship geometry  and  speed  as well as on the  geometry configuration of  the
               operating area. Since the mean sinkage can be accurately calculated by means of the potential theory,
               for  instance using  an  extended  shallow-water  approximation,  this new  method  could  impact  the
               resistance and propulsion prediction of the ship performance in shallow water.


               2  RESISTANCE PERFORMANCE

               The experiments reported here were conducted in the main towing tank (200 m x 9.81 m x 1.2 m) of
               the  Duisburg  Shallow Water  Towing  Tank  (VBD). Its  water  depth  can be  adjusted to  any value
               between  0-1.2  meter.  Two ships were chosen for model tests.  One is an inland-ship  with a ducted
               propeller and its model of scale 14 has a length at the load waterline 7.857 m, a beam 0.818 m, a draft
               0.214 m and a wetted surface 9.059 mz , see the body plan in Fig. 1. More details could be found in the
               work  of  Lochte-Holtgreven et  al.(2001).  The  other  is  a  typical  containership  model  with  a
               conventional single screw. It has a length-beam ratio 6.08 and a beam-draft ratio 2.9. The model has a
               draft 0.255 m and a wetted surface 4.0 mz.












                                   Figure 1 : Body plan of the subject inland ship
   530   531   532   533   534   535   536   537   538   539   540