Page 186 - Practical Ship Design
P. 186

152                                                             Chapter 5

             capacity and sometimes the speed are determined by the design instead of being
             the main factors that determine it.
                The design processes for these ships are essentially non-standard and give the
             naval architect a chance to exercise his ingenuity. Some methods and ideas relating
             to these types may, however, be of interest.


             5.7, I  Container ships
             As the design deadweight of most container ships can be carried at a draft less than
             that obtainable with  a type B freeboard, deadweight cannot be used directly to
             determine the main dimensions.
                On the other hand, as container  ships carry a substantial  proportion  of  their
             cargo on deck, it is not possible to base the design on the required cargo volume as
             this is indeterminate. In these circumstances, stability considerations take over the
             primary role in the determination of the main dimensions.
                For maximum  economy in the design of  any container  ship, the dimensions
             should be such that containers can be stacked up in tiers to the limit permitted by
             stability. To maximise numbers, the upper tiers, subject to the owners agreement,
             should be reserved for relatively lightly loaded (or even empty) containers, whilst
             heavier containers are directed to the lower levels. It may also be desirable in the
             interests  of  maximising  container numbers  and therefore revenue  to design the
              ship to carry ballast, either permanent or water or both even in the load departure
             condition - something that would be a heresy in the design of most ship types!
                For each number of tiers of containers carried there is an associated breadth of
              ship which will provide the KM necessary to ensure stability, whether the tiers are
              enclosed below hatch covers or carried on deck being a second order effect. Ships
              designed to achieve a particularly high KM for a given breadth obviously have an
              advantage provided any penalty incurred in powering or seakeeping is acceptable
              (see Chapter 8, 58.6)
                Longitudinal and torsional strength require a proportion of  the breadth of the
              ship to be devoted to structural decks with the balance of the “open” ship providing
              space for a number of container cells with their cell guides. There is therefore a
              direct  relationship  between  the  number  of  container  tiers  and  the  number  of
              container rows in the breadth.
                A first approximation to the length of the ship is then generally determined by
              what is thought to be an economically desirable value of  the lengthheam ratio.
              This is then adjusted in association with the length required for the engine room,
              peak tanks, cell guides,bulkhead stiffeners etc. so that the cargo spaces are tailored
              to a multiple of container lengths.
                With the number of container tiers “fixing” the number of rows in the breadth
              and this in turn “fixing” the number of container cells in the length, there is the
   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191