Page 216 - Practical Ship Design
P. 216

Powering I                                                           181


           It was  rather  disconcerting to find  that  the  formula for  (1  + K) in the  third
         reference  was  significantly  changed  from  that  given  in  the  second  with  new
         variables being introduced, and even more to find an even greater change in the last
         reference involving a new factor Y which modifies (1 + K) to (1 + Y . K) with  Y
         varying with Froude number.
           As this new factor is associated with formulae for C,,, which are not given, most
         users continue to use the formulae given in the third reference which seems to have
         given reasonably satisfactory results to date.
           The simplified formula for (1 + K) mentioned above is as follows:

         1+K=
         0.93+0.487 . (C),, . (B/L)1.068.   (L/L,)o.'22.  (L3//v)n.365 . (l-C,)-"."4  (6.43)

         factor no.   I      2       3       4         5         6 (for reference)

           In this formula L is waterline length
           C, is the prismatic coefficient on this length
         The length of run L, in factor 4 is defined as:

           L, = L[ 1 - C, + 0.06 Cp lcb/(4 C, - l)]                       (6.44)
         where  lcb is the longitudinal centre of buoyancy forward (+) or aft (-)  of 0.5 L as a
         % of L.
           Factor 1 is defined as C,, = 1 + 0.01 1 C,,,,
           C,,,,,  = -25  to -20  barge-shaped forms
                 = -10  after body with V sections
                 = 0 normal shape of after body
                 = +IO after body with U sections and Hogner stern

           Figure  6.3 abstracted  from the  1988 paper  may  help  interpretation  of  these
         values.
           Another reason for giving the formula for (1 + K) is because there seems to be
         little other data on this factor and designers may wish to use it along with other
         powering data (but see later).
           Most users of this formula will tend to use it embedded in a computer program
         and will thus gain little, if any, knowledge of the relative importance of the various
         factors or, indeed, of what (1 + K) value to expect for a particular type of ship.
           Values have therefore been calculated in Table 6.2 for a number of  ship types.
         The first three ships conform to the standard dimensions of  122 x  16.76 x 7.32 m
         with two extreme block coefficients  and a middle value. The other particulars
         required  being  set  at  values  reasonably  appropriate  to  each  of  the  block
         coefficients.
   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221