Page 283 - Practical Ship Design
P. 283

Design cf  Lines                                                     24 I


        twin-screw ship can be optimised almost entirely on resistance considerations with
        little need to consider the flow to the propellers which, as has been seen, plays a
        major part in the design of the stern of a single-screw ship.
           In thinking  about the LCB position  and indeed about the value of  the block
        coefficient, it is important not to be mesmerised by the figures themselves but to
        keep clearly in mind what they mean in terms of the ships lines.
           Figure 8.7 tries to illustrate this point and shows how and why the LCB moves
        as the c, changes from unity to a very fine form.
           (i)   At C, = 1 .OO the LCB must of course be at amidships.
           (ii)  For a barge the first essential is a swim bow, so at about C,, = 0.95 the LCB
               moves aft to say 1.5% A.
           (iii)  The next improvement to be made to ease movement of the vessel is a
               swim stern, so at about c,, = 0.90 the LCB moves back to amidships.
           (iv)  For the slowest self propelled shipshape vessel the bow is now generally
               very full-spoon shaped and this coupled with the need for good flow to the
               propeller(s), requiring fining aft means that for a c,, of between 0.90 and
               0.75 the LCB is well forward, say about 2.5-3.0%  or even 3.5% The use of
               big “outboard” type propellers reduces the problem of propeller support on
               a full ship and to some extent the problems of flow to the propellers and
               enables very full block coefficients to be used.
           (v)   Once the run has been made such that it provides a satisfactory flow to the
               propeller, it is only necessary to fine it very gradually as the block coeffi-
               cient  is  further  reduced  for  ships  with  higher  speeds  and powers.  The
               forebody, on the other hand, is where reductions in wavemaking resistance
               can best be effected and from being markedly fuller than the aft body, the
               forebody changes to being much finer, with the result that the LCB prog-
               ressively shifts to a position well aft of amidships.
           (vi)  Finally for very fine ships there is a tendency for the LCB to return towards
               amidships.
           Figure 8.8 gives a plot of the optimum range of LCB position for both normal
        and bulbous bow forms against C,, on the assumption that the block coefficient is
        related to the Froude number generally in accordance with the WatsodGilfillan
        line. It will be seen that there is an appreciable range of choice without incurring an
        excessive penalty - but it is worth remembering that the penalty for a “too far
        forward” position is usually much worse than that for a position “too far aft”.


        8.3.2 The sectional urea curve

        The  sectional  area curve  is  one of  the  principal  factors which  determines the
        resistance of a ship and careful attention should be paid to its form. The first step
   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288