Page 36 - Practical Well Planning and Drilling Manual
P. 36

Section 1 revised 11/00/bc  1/17/01  2:55 PM  Page 12








                      [      ]  Well Design
                       1.1.2



                           With the hole section summaries completed, you now have a
                       detailed overview of all the relevant wells. Now look at each formation
                       and list all the problems seen within that formation: tight hole,
                       enlarged hole, kicks, stuck pipe, etc. For each problem, do a complete
                       analysis and establish:

                             What were the contributing factors that can be seen from the
                             data?
                             What other factors may have been relevant but were not noted
                             in the records?
                             How can this problem be eliminated, or at least reduced?
                             What actions can be taken if the problem is seen on the next
                             well to mitigate the effects of the problem?

                           If possible, avoid relying on the conclusions of other people
                       who have reported on the problem. It is better to look at the source
                       data yourself and make your own conclusions. Let me give a real
                       case example.
                           An offshore well was being planned in the Mediterranean.
                       According to prognosis, the pore pressure was to increase from normal
                       pressure (hydrostatic) only 500 m below the seabed. Offset wells, even
                       using oil-based mud, had reported very unstable wellbore conditions in
                       shallow Pliocene shales with large quantities of cavings. A report by the
                       previous concession holder had looked at seismic and sonic data, con-
                       cluding that increased sonic transit times were due to undercompact-
                       ed/overpressured shales. On the surface, this was consistent with the
                       drilling problems that were experienced .
                           A closer look at the hole section summary revealed some interest-
                       ing facts. Using oil-based mud in the first offset well, bottoms up after
                       wipertrips had brought up large quantities of cavings. Mud density was
                       increased, but the problem got worse, not better. However, they con-
                       tinued to increase the mud density and still the cavings level increased
                       every time they wipertripped, which was often. The third offset well
                       was drilled with a pilot hole through these shales and opened up with
                       seawater with no flow from the well.
                           Unfortunately, samples from the shakers were not available from
                       this interval on any of the offset wells. However, all the evidence
                       seemed to be consistent with fractured shales, not overpressured
                       shales. The mud used on the new well included additives to plug off


                                                      12
   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41