Page 209 - Privacy in a Cyber Age Policy and Practice
P. 209

NOTES  197

           45.  Craig Mundie, “Privacy Pragmatism: Focus on Data Use, Not Data Collection,”
              Foreign Affairs, March/April 2014.
           46.  See, for example, Justice Marshall in 442 U.S. 735 (1979) (arguing that “unless
              a person is prepared to forgo [. . .] personal or professional necessity, he can-
              not help but accept the risk of surveillance [by third parties],” which is of less
              relevance to privacy than “the risks he should be forced to assume in a free and
              open society.”). See also United States V. Jones, 615 F. 3d 544 (Justice Sotomayor
              argues the third-party doctrine is “ill suited to the digital age”).
           47.  James J. Tomkovicz, “Beyond Secrecy for Secrecy’s Sake: Toward an Expanded
              Vision of the Fourth Amendment Privacy Province,”  Hastings Law Journal
              36 (1985) 645, 649; Richard G. Wilkins, “Defining the ‘Reasonable Expecta-
              tion of Privacy’: An Emerging Tripartite Analysis,” Vanderbilt Law Review 40
              (1987): 1077, 1087.
           48.  Anthony G. Amsterdam, “Perspectives on the Fourth Amendment,” Minnesota
              Law Review 58 (1974): 349, 382.
           49.  Orin S. Kerr, “The Fourth Amendment and New Technologies: Constitutional
              Myths and the Case for Caution,” Michigan Law Review 102 (2004): 820.
           50.  389 U.S. 347, 361.
           51.  Daniel T. Pesciotta, “I’m Not Dead Yet: Katz, Jones, and the Fourth Amend-
              ment in the 21st Century,” Case Western Reserve Law Review 63 (2012):
              188, 243.
           52.  United States v. Katz, 389 U.S. 352.
           53.  468 U.S. 705, 714.
           54.  Kyllo v. United States, 533 U.S. at 34, 40.
           55.  United States v. Knotts, 460 U.S. 276 (1983).
           56.  California v. Ciraolo, 476 U.S. 207 (1986).
           57.  Dow Chem. Co. v. United States, 476 U.S. 227 (1986).
           58.  United States v. Jones, 615 F. 3d 544.
           59.  Pesciotta, “I’m Not Dead Yet,” 244.
           60. Ibid., 230.
           61.  Ibid.; Sherry F. Colb, “The Supreme Court Decides the GPS Case, United States
              v. Jones, and the Fourth Amendment Evolves,” Verdict Justia (2012).
           62.  United States v. Jones, 615 F. 3d 544 (2012).
           63. Ibid.
           64.  “New surveillance technology can track everyone in an area for hours at a
              time,” Washington Post, February 5, 2014: Persistent Security Systems uses air-
              borne cameras to “track every vehicle and person across an area the size of a
              small city, for several hours at a time.” [. . .] “Police are supposed to begin looking
              at the pictures only after a crime has been reported.”
           65.  New York City Government, “Mayor Bloomberg, Police Commissioner Kelly
              and Microsoft unveil new, state-of-the-art technology that aggregates and
              analyzes existing public safety data in real time to provide a comprehensive
              view of potential threats and criminal activity,” August 8, 2012: A joint effort
              of Microsoft and the New York Police Department “aggregates and analyzes
              existing public safety data streams” from cameras, license plate readers, radia-
              tion detectors, and law enforcement databases. The technology helps police
   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214