Page 212 - Privacy in a Cyber Age Policy and Practice

200 NOTES

“Fourth Amendment: Search and Seizure,” Government Printing Office, October
1992, available at http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/GPO-CONAN-1992/pdf/
GPO-CONAN-1992-10-5.pdf.
28. Emily Hickman, “Colonial Writs of Assistance,” The New England Quarterly
5, 1 (1932): 84.
29. Clancy, “The Framers’ Intent,” 980.
30. M. Jackson Jones, “The Fourth Amendment and Search Warrant Presentment:
Is a Man’s House Always His Castle?” American Journal of Trial Advocacy 35,
3 (2012): 529–34.
31. The connection in Wilkes is more dubious because the warrant in question
searched five houses but also arrested more than forty individuals, but it still
remains. Jones, “The Fourth Amendment and Search Warrant Presentment,”
529–34.
32. Antos-Fallon, “The Fourth Amendment and Immigration Enforcement in
the Home,” 1008; Sean M. Lewis, “The Fourth Amendment in the Hallway:
Do Tenants Have a Constitutionally Protected Privacy Interest in the Locked
Common Areas of Their Apartment Building?” Michigan Law Review 101,
1 (October 2002): 303.
33. Fradella et al., “Quantifying Katz,” 327.
34. Myra Marx Ferree, “Beyond Separate Spheres: Feminism and Family Research,”
Journal of Marriage and the Family 52, 4 (November 1990): 867.
35. Tracy E. Higgins, “Reviving the Public/Private Distinction in Feminist
Theorizing,” Chicago-Kent Law Review 75, 3 (2000): 847.
36. Leila J. Rupp, cited in Colin Koopman, “Public and Private in Feminism and
Pragmatism,” International Studies in Philosophy 40, 2 (2008), 49.
37. Raia Prokhovnik, cited in Ronnie Cohen and Shannon O’Byrne, “‘Can You
Hear Me Now . . . Good!’ Feminism(s), the Public/Private Divide, and Citizens
United v. FEC,” UCLA Women’s Law Journal 20, 1, (2013): 39.
38. Cited in Colin Koopman, “Public and Private in Feminism and Pragmatism,”
International Studies in Philosophy 40, 2008): 49.
39. Ruth Gavison, “Feminism and the Public/Private Distinction,” Stanford Law
Review 45, 1 (November 1992): 5–7.
40. Cohen and O’Byrne, “‘Can You Hear Me Now . . . Good!’,” 41.
41. Tracy E. Higgins, “Reviving the Public/Private Distinction in Feminist
Theorizing,” Chicago-Kent Law Review 75, 3 (January 2000): 848.
42. Gavison, “Feminism and the Public/Private Distinction,” 21.
43. Mary Dietz, cited in Koopman, “Public and Private in Feminism and Pragma-
tism,” 53.
44. Gavison, “Feminism and the Public/Private Distinction,” 3.
45. Higgins, “Reviving the Public/Private Distinction in Feminist Theorizing,”
851.
46. Cited in Gavison, “Feminism and the Public/Private Distinction,” 1–2.
47. Higgins, “Reviving the Public/Private Distinction in Feminist Theorizing,”
851.
48. Gavison, “Feminism and the Public/Private Distinction,” 22.