Page 227 - Privacy in a Cyber Age Policy and Practice

NOTES 215

16. See, for example, Amitai Etzioni, ed., Civic Repentance (Lanham: Rowman &
Littlefield, 1999); Amitai Etzioni and David Carney, eds., Repentance: A Com-
parative Perspective (Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 1997).
17. Jeffrey Rosen, “The Right to Be Forgotten,” Stanford Law Review Online 64
(2012): 88.
18. Viviane Reding, “The EU Data Protection Reform 2012: Making Europe the
Standard Setter for Modern Data Protection Rules in the Digital Age” (speech,
Munich, Germany, January 22, 2012), European Commission, http://europa.eu/
rapid/press-release_SPEECH-12-26_en.htm.
19. Jeffrey Rosen, “The Right to Be Forgotten,” 88.
20. John Hendel, “Why Journalists Shouldn’t Fear Europe’s ‘Right to be Forgotten,’”
The Atlantic, January 25, 2012, http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/
archive/2012/01/why-journalists-shouldnt-fear-europes-right-to-be-
forgotten/251955/?single_page=true.
21. Jeffrey Toobin, “The Solace of Oblivion,” New Yorker, September 29, 2014,
http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2014/09/29/solace-oblivion.
22. Caitlin Dewey, “Pianist Asks The Washington Post to Remove a Concert Review
under the E.U.’s ‘Right to Be Forgotten’ Ruling,” Washington Post, October 31, 2014,
http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-intersect/wp/2014/10/31/pianist-
asks-the-washington-post-to-remove-a-concert-review-under-the-e-u-s-
right-to-be-forgotten-ruling/.
23. “European privacy requests for search removals,” Google, updated November 14,
2014, https://www.google.com/transparencyreport/removals/euro
peprivacy/.
24. David Kravets, “Google Has Removed 170,000-plus URLs under “Right to
Be Forgotten” edict,” Ars Technica, October 10, 2014, http://arstechnica.com/
tech-policy/2014/10/google-has-removed-170000-plus-urls-under-right-to-
be-forgotten-edict/.
25. Giancarlo Frosio, “EU Data Protection Authority Adopts Guidelines on the
Implementation of the Right to Be Forgotten,” The Center for Internet and
Society at Stanford Law School, November 28, 2014, available at http://cyberlaw.
stanford.edu/blog/2014/11/eu-data-protection-authority-adopts-guidelines-
implementation-right-be-forgotten.

Chapter 9

1. To qualify as legal, the program is required to not target Americans. Thus,
PRISM searches are carried out only when there is at least “51 percent confi-
dence in a target’s ‘foreignness.’”
Timothy B. Lee, “How Congress Unknowingly Legalized PRISM in 2007,”
The Washington Post, June 6, 2013, http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/
wonkblog/wp/2013/06/06/how-congress-unknowingly-legalized-prism-
in-2007/.
2. See Amitai Etzioni, The New Golden Rule: Community and Morality in a Demo-
cratic Society (New York: Basic Books, 1996).