Page 257 - Privacy in a Cyber Age Policy and Practice

246 INDEX

Domain Awareness System, 11, Katz v. United States, 23, 40, 49–59, 61,
43–44, 58 68–69
Dow Chemical Company v. United Kerr, Orin, 6–7, 11, 15
States, 3, 55, 57 Kyllo v. United States, 8–9, 38–39, 68
DNA, 18, 46, 157–177
law
Easton, Raymond, 163–164 case, see court cases by name
Entick v. Carrington, 63 international, 142
Epstein, Richard A., 21, 49 statutory, see privacy, statutory
European Union Data Protection protections of
Directive, 13–14, 22–23, 85–86, 120 Lawless, Matthew, 13
expectation of privacy, 8, 23–24, 49–54 libertarianism, 5, 29–30, 46, 83,
102–103, 111–112
Feinstein, Dianne, 96,148, 152
feminism, 3, 64–65 MacKinnon, Catharine, 3
Fifth Amendment, 169–170 McClain, Linda, 3
financial information, 21 Mayer-SchÖnberger, Viktor,
Florida v. Jardines, 41 20, 115
Florida v. Riley, 39 Maryland v. King, 159, 160
fundamental rights approach, see Maynard v. United States, see United
European Union Data Protection States v. Jones
Directive metadata, 44, 123, 131
Michigan Department of State Police v.
general searches, 106, 133–135; see also Sitz, 134
administrative searches minimization, 16, 161–162
mosaic theory of the Fourth
Harlan, Marshall, 54, 56–57, 69 Amendment, 2, 11, 42–43
Hoboken, Jaris van, 23 Mundie, Craig, 20, 56
Holder, Eric, 98, 125
homes, 3–4, 38–39, 41, 56–59, 61–73, 134 national security, 34–35, 44, 46, 53,
history of housing exceptionalism, 62 98–100, 104–105, 106, 110–111,
homelessness, 66–67 124–156
curtilage, 41 New York Times Co. v. United States,
125
Illinois v. Lidster, 134 Nojeim, Greg, 13
individual rights normative considerations, 4–5, 25–26,
balance with common good, 5–7, 81–82
103–106, 175–176
information as privacy approach, see Obama, Barack, 93, 97–98, 100,
European Union Data Protection 103, 125–126, 132, 143, 148
Directive Olmstead v. United States, 3, 62
intimate information, see sensitivity
intrusiveness, 4, 7 Paul, Rand, 155
Payton v. New York, 63
Johnson v. United States, 62 Perry, Rick, 114