Page 254 - Privacy in a Cyber Age Policy and Practice

242 NOTES

Forensic DNA Help to Solve Crime? The Benefit of Sophisticated Answers to
Naïve Questions,” Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice 26 (2010): 463.
106. W. T. Dunsmuir, C. Tran, and D. Weatherburn, “Assessing the Impact of Man-
datory DNA Testing of Prison Inmates in NSW on Clearance, Charge, and
Conviction Rates for Selected Crime Categories,” (2008) cited in David B.
Wilson et al., “Does Forensic DNA Help to Solve Crime?,” 463.
107. David B. Wilson et al., “Use of DNA Testing in Police Investigative Work for
Increasing Offender Identification, Arrest, Conviction and Case Clearance,”
2011 Campbell Systematic Reviews (2011).
108. Matthew Gabriel et al., “Beyond the Cold Hit: Measuring the Impact of the
National DNA Data Bank on Public Safety at the City and County Level,”
Journal of Law, Medicine, and Ethics 38 (2010): 399; John K. Roman et al.,
“The DNA Field Experiment,” 346.
109. “DNA Links Longtime Boston Strangler Suspect to Murder,” Associated Press,
July 11, 2013, http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/dna-links-longtime-boston-
strangler-suspect-to-murder-1.1329562.
110. Amitai Etzioni, “A Cyber Age Privacy Doctrine.”
111. Philip Hunter, “All the Evidence,” EMBO Reports 7 (2006):4
112. Ricky Ansell, “Internal Quality Control in Forensic DNA Analysis,” Accredi-
tation and Quality Assurance 18 (2013): 281.
113. Ibid., 285.
114. Federal Bureau of Investigation “Standards for Forensic DNA Testing Labo-
ratories,” http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/lab/biometric-analysis/codis/stds_
testlabs.
115. Ibid.
116. William C. Thompson, “Are Juries Competent to Evaluate Statistical Evi-
dence?” Law and Contemporary Problems 52 (1989): 9–10, 41; Jason Schk-
lar and Shari Seidman Diamond, “Juror Reactions to DNA Evidence: Errors
and Expectancies,” Law and Human Behavior 23 (1999): 159; Dan Frumkin,
Adam Wasserstrom, Ariane Davidson, and Arnon Grafit, “Authentication of
Forensic DNA samples,” Forensic Science International: Genetics 4 (2010):102.
117. Mark Nelson et al., “Making Sense of DNA Backlogs, 2012—Myths vs. Reality,”
National Institute of Justice, United States Department of Justice Office of Justice
Programs (December 2013), https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/243347.pdf.
118. This is not the total number of cases received in 2011; it is a snapshot of
the cases that were pending at the laboratories at that point. Other cases had
already been given final reports. See Mark Nelson et al., “Making Sense of
DNA Backlogs, 2012 – Myths vs. Reality.”
119. “Women Express Concern over Police Rape Kit Backlogs,” Associated Press,
March 19, 2012, http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/crime-scene/post/
women-express-concern-over-police-rape-kit-backlogs/2012/03/19/
gIQATVRhMS_blog.html.
120. See, for example, Rajendrani Mukhopadhyay, “Forensic Flow,” Chemistry
World (April 2011): 50–53.
121. Jim Ridley, “Demetria Kalodinos Tells the Story of Jeffrey Womack, the
Boy Who Didn’t Kill Marcia Trimble,” Nashville Scene, November 15, 2012,